Repository logo
 

Matched-accent processing: Bulgarian-English bilinguals do not have a processing advantage with Bulgarian-accented English over native English speech

dc.contributor.authorDokovova, Marieen
dc.contributor.authorScobbie, James M.en
dc.contributor.authorLickley, Robinen
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T10:02:41Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T10:02:41Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-10
dc.descriptionJames Scobbie - ORCID: 0000-0003-4509-6782 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-6782en
dc.descriptionRobin Lickley - ORCID: 0000-0003-2583-5461 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-5461
dc.descriptionVoR deposited 2022-06-13.
dc.description.abstractThe Interlanguage Intelligibility Benefit hypothesis (ISIB) for Talkers suggests that there is a potential benefit when listening to one’s second language when it is produced in the accent of one’s first language (matched-accent processing). This study explores ISIB, considering listener proficiency. According to second language learning theories, the listener’s second language proficiency determines the extent to which they rely on their first language phonetics, hence the magnitude of ISIB may be affected by listener proficiency. The accuracy and reaction times of Bulgarian-English bilinguals living in the UK were recorded in a lexical decision task. The English stimuli were produced by native English speakers and Bulgarian-English bilinguals. Listeners responded more slowly and less accurately to the matched-accent stimuli than the native English stimuli. In addition, they adapted their reaction times faster to new speakers with a native English accent compared to a Bulgarian accent. However, the listeners with the lowest English proficiency had no advantage in reaction times and accuracy for either accent. The results offer mixed support for ISIB for Talkers and are consistent with second language learning theories, according to which listeners rely less on their native language phonology when their proficiency in the second language has increased.en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number1
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the full-time doctoral bursary of Queen Margaret University.en
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6423en
dc.description.volume13
dc.identifierhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/20.500.12289/11978/11978.pdf
dc.identifier.citationDokovova, M., Scobbie, J.M. and Lickley, R. (2022) ‘Matched-accent processing: Bulgarian-English bilinguals do not have a processing advantage with Bulgarian-accented English over native English speech’, Laboratory Phonology, 13(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6423.en
dc.identifier.issn1868-6354en
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6423
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/11978
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOpen Library of Humanitiesen
dc.relation.ispartofLaboratory Phonologyen
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBulgarian-English Bilingualsen
dc.subjectL2 Phoneticsen
dc.subjectProficiencyen
dc.subjectMatched-Accenten
dc.subjectInterlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefiten
dc.titleMatched-accent processing: Bulgarian-English bilinguals do not have a processing advantage with Bulgarian-accented English over native English speechen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightspublic
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-23
qmu.authorDokovova, Marieen
qmu.authorScobbie, James M.en
qmu.authorLickley, Robinen
qmu.centreCASL
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.dateDeposit2022-04-05
refterms.dateFCD2022-04-05
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionAMen
rioxxterms.publicationdate2022-06-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
11978.pdf
Size:
892.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Version
Thumbnail Image
Name:
11978vor.pdf
Size:
1.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version

Collections