Repository logo
 

Using a prognostic medical device for early identification of pressure ulcers: protocol for study design

dc.contributor.authorKeltie, Kimen
dc.contributor.authorParker, Rosalynen
dc.contributor.authorDervin, Humayraen
dc.contributor.authorPagnamenta, Faniaen
dc.contributor.authorMilne, Jeanetteen
dc.contributor.authorBelilios, Emmaen
dc.contributor.authorLatimer, Lizzyen
dc.contributor.authorWason, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorOgundimu, Emmanuelen
dc.contributor.authorMcParlin, Catherineen
dc.contributor.authorSims, Andrewen
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-01T06:33:52Z
dc.date.available2024-07-01T06:33:52Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-20
dc.descriptionItem is not available in this repository.en
dc.descriptionRosalyn Parker - ORCID: 0000-0002-0873-6878 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-6878
dc.description.abstractBackground: An objective, physiological measurement taken using a medical device may reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers through earlier detection of problems signs before visual signs appear. Research in this field is hampered by variations in clinical practice and patient-level confounders. Aim: The authors outline key considerations for designing a protocol for a study to assess the efficacy and safety of a prognostic medical device in reducing pressure ulcer incidence in a hospital, including comparators, randomisation, sample size, ethics and practical issues. Method: Key issues relating to methodology and ethics are considered alongside a theoretical protocol, which could support future researchers in wound care trials. Results: A prospective, three-armed, multi-centre, stratified cluster-randomised controlled trial is proposed. The third arm is recommended as it is expected that patients will need to be moved for the medical device to be used and repositioning is a preventive strategy. A minimum of 16200 patients in 33 wards would needed to be recruited to achieve statistical significance. Ethical considerations in terms of consent or assent need to be considered. Conclusion: The hypothetical study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a diagnostic or prognostic medical device in reducing pressure ulcer incidence in secondary care, while accounting for biases, would require large sample sizes and involves risks of inter-operator and inter-device reliability, heterogeneity of users and the vague clinical interpretation of device results. Robust research in this field has the potential to influence or change policy and practice relating to the prevention of pressure ulcers in secondary care. © 2024 MA Healthcare Ltd.en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number12en
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0158en
dc.description.volume33en
dc.format.extentS8–S18en
dc.identifier.citationKeltie, K., Parker, R., Dervin, H., Pagnamenta, F., Milne, J., Belilios, E., Latimer, L., Wason, J., Ogundimu, E., McParlin, C. and Sims, A. (2024) ‘Using a prognostic medical device for early identification of pressure ulcers: protocol for study design’, British Journal of Nursing, 33(12), pp. S8–S18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0158.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/13804
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0158
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMA Healthcareen
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Nursingen
dc.subjectEthical Considerationsen
dc.subjectMedical Deviceen
dc.subjectPressure Ulceren
dc.subjectPreventionen
dc.subjectRandomised Controlled Trialen
dc.subjectSkin Assessmenten
dc.subjectStudy Designen
dc.titleUsing a prognostic medical device for early identification of pressure ulcers: protocol for study designen
dc.typeArticleen
dcterms.accessRightsnone
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-01-01
qmu.authorParker, Rosalynen
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.dateDeposit2024-07-01
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionNAen
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen

Files

Collections