The phonetics phonology overlap
| dc.contributor.author | Scobbie, James M. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-29T15:52:49Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-06-29T15:52:49Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005-09 | |
| dc.description | This is a draft of chapter entitled Interface and Overlap in Phonetics and Phonology submitted to Charles Reiss & Gillian Ranchand (eds) The Book of Interfaces. Now published in Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17-52. This series consists of unpublished working- papers. They are not final versions and may be superseded by publication in journal or book form, which should be cited in preference. All rights remain with the author(s) at this stage, and circulation of a work in progress in this series does not prejudice its later publication. Comments to authors are welcome. Now published in Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17-52. | |
| dc.description.abstract | The concept of an interface in linguistics implies a connection between two distinct theoretical domains, each concerned with a distinct group of linguistic phenomena. If the domains or phenomena are very different, the purpose and nature of an interface in the theory is to state (explicitly and without redundancy) any necessary connections between what would otherwise be independent aspects of the grammar. On the other hand, if the domains or phenomena have numerous similarities, the interface is additionally characterised by theoretical competition between descriptions of and explanations for particular phenomena. In this situation, linguistic data are thought to be capable of providing evidence for particular theories of modular demarcation. | |
| dc.description.eprintid | 138 | |
| dc.description.faculty | casl | |
| dc.description.ispublished | pub | |
| dc.description.referencetext | Anderson, Stephen R. 1981 Why phonology isn't natural. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 493-539. Beckman, Mary E. 1990 Phonetic Representation. Journal of Phonetics 18 (3): 297-477. Boersma, Paul 1998 Functional Phonology. Amsterdam: HIL. Browman, Catherine P. and Louis Goldstein 1995 Gestural syllable position effects in American English. In: F Bell-Berti and Lawrence J. Raphael (eds.) Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues. For Katherine Safford Harris. 19-34. Browman, Catherine P. and Louis Goldstein 2004 Articulatory Phonology: an overview. Phonetica 9: 155-180. Burton-Roberts, Noel, Philip Carr, and Gerard J. Docherty (eds.) 2000 Phonological Knowledge : Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bybee, Joan 2001 Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bybee, Joan and Paul Hopper (eds.) 2002 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Cho, Taehong, Sun A. Jun and Peter Ladefoged 2002 Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30: 193-228. Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle 1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. Cohn, Abigail C 1990 Phonetic and Phonological Rules of Nasalization. PhD Thesis: UCLA. Cohn, Abigail C in press Gradience and categoriality in sound patterns. Coleman, John2002 Phonetic representations in the mental lexicon. In: Jacques Durand and Bernard Lax (eds.) Phonetics, Phonology, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 96-130. Flemming, Edward 2001 Scalar and categorical phenomena in a unified model of phonetics and phonology. Phonology 18: 7-44. Fodor, J. A. 1983 The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Goldinger, Stephen D.1997 Words and voices: Perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In: Keith Johnson and John W. Mullenix (eds.) Talker Variability in Speech Processing. London: Academic Press, 33-66. Gussenhoven, C. and R. Kager 2001 Introduction: phonetics in phonology. Phonology 18: 1-6. Hale, Mark and Charles Reiss 2000a Phonology as cognition. In: Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr and Gerard J. Docherty (eds.) Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 161-184. Hale, Mark and Charles Reiss 2000b Substance abuse and dysfunctionalism: current trends in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 157-169. Halle, Morris 1959 The Sound Pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton. Hayes, Bruce, Robert Kirchner, and Donca Steriade (eds.) 2004 Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hume, Elizabeth and Keith Johnson (eds.) 2001 The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology. San Diego: Academic Press. Johnson, Keith1997 Speech perception without talker normalization. In: Keith Johnson and John W. Mullenix (eds.) Talker Variability in Speech Processing. London: Academic Press, 146-165. Keating, Patricia A. 1984 Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60: 286-319. Keating, Patricia A. 1985 Universal phonetics and the organisation of grammars. In: Victoria Fromkin (ed.) Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Peter Ladefoged. Orlando: Academic Press Keating, Patricia A. 1990 Phonetic representation in a generative grammar. Journal of Phonetics 18: 321-334. Kirchner, Robert 1998 An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. PhD Thesis: UCLA. Lindblom, Bjorn 1990 On the notion of 'possible speech sound'. Journal of Phonetics 18: 135-152. Manaster-Ramer, Alexis 1996a A letter from an incompletely neutral phonologist. Journal of Phonetics 24: 477-489. Manaster-Ramer, Alexis 1996b Report on Alexis' dreams - bad as well as good. Journal of Phonetics 24: 513-519. Mullenix, John W. 1997 On the nature of perceptual adjustments to voice. In: Keith Johnson and John W. Mullenix (eds.) Talker Variability in Speech Processing. London: Academic Press, 67-84. Ohala, John J. 1990 There is no interface between phonology and phonetics: a personal view. Journal of Phonetics 18: 153-171. Ohala, John J. 1995 The relation between phonetics and phonology. In: William J. Hardcastle and John Laver (eds.) The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences. Cambridge: Blackwell, 674-694. Perkins, Michael R. 2005 Editorial. Clinical pragmatics: An emergentist perspective. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 19: 363-366. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1990 Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of Phonetics 18: 375-394. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001 Stochastic phonology. Glot International 5: 195-2. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2002 Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In: Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper (eds.) Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137-157. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2003 Probabilistic phonology: discrimination and robustness. In: Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay and Stefanie Jannedy (eds.) Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 177-228. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. and Mary E. Beckman 1998 Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Mary E. Beckman and D. R. Ladd 2000 Conceptual foundations of phonology as a laboratory science. In: Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr and Gerard J. Docherty (eds.) Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273-303. Pierrehumbert, Janet B and Paul Gross 2003 Community Phonology. Chicago Linguistics Society. Pisoni, David B. 1997 Some thoughts on normalisation in speech perception. In: Keith Johnson and John W. Mullenix (eds.) Talker Variability in Speech Processing. London: Academic Press, 9-32. Scobbie, James M. 1995 What do we do when phonology is powerful enough to imitate phonetics? Comments on Zsiga. In Bruce Connell and Amalia Arvaniti (eds.) Phonology and Phonetic Evidence. Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303-314. Scobbie, James M. 1997 Autosegmental Representation in a Declarative Constraint-Based Framework. New York, NY: Garland Publishers Inc. Scobbie, James M. in press Flexibility in the Face of Incompatible English VOT Systems. In Louis M. Goldstein, Cathi Best and Doug Whalen (eds.) Papers in Laboratory Phonology 8: Varieties of Phonological Competence. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Scobbie, James M. in preparation Almost contrast: the quasi-phonemic nature of Scottish vowel length. Silverman, Daniel 1997 Phasing and Recoverability. New York, NY: Garland. Silverman, Daniel 2004 A critical introduction to phonology: of sound, mind, and body. Continuum: London, New York. Steriade, Donca 2004 Directional asymmetries in assimilation. In: Elizabeth Hume and Keith Johnson (eds.) The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology.San Diego: Academic Press, 219-250. Vihman, Marilyn M. and Shelley L. Velleman 2000 Phonetics and the origin of phonology. In: Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr and Gerard J. Docherty (eds.) Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 305-339. Zsiga, E. 1997 Features, gestures, and Igbo vowel assimilation: An approach to the phonology/phonetics mapping. Language 73: 227. | |
| dc.description.status | pub | |
| dc.identifier | ER138 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Scobbie, J. (2005) The phonetics phonology overlap, QMU Speech Science Research Centre Working Papers, WP-1. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/138 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | QMU Speech Science Research Centre Working Papers, WP-1 | |
| dc.title | The phonetics phonology overlap | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dcterms.accessRights | public | |
| qmu.author | Scobbie, James M. | |
| qmu.centre | CASL | en |
| rioxxterms.type | article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1