Repository logo
 

Coronary intervention door-to-balloon time and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorFoo, Chee Yoongen
dc.contributor.authorBonsu, Kwadwo Oseien
dc.contributor.authorNallamothu, Brahmajee Ken
dc.contributor.authorReid, Christopher M.en
dc.contributor.authorDhippayom, Teeraponen
dc.contributor.authorReidpath, Danielen
dc.contributor.authorChaiyakunapruk, Nathornen
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T13:14:09Z
dc.date.available2023-02-20T13:14:09Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-05
dc.descriptionDaniel Reidpath - ORCID: 0000-0002-8796-0420 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-0420en
dc.descriptionItem is not available in this repository.
dc.description.abstractObjective This study aims to determine the relationship between door-to-balloon delay in primary percutaneous coronary intervention and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) outcomes and examine for potential effect modifiers. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies that have investigated the relationship of door-to-balloon delay and clinical outcomes. The main outcomes include mortality and heart failure. Results 32 studies involving 299 320 patients contained adequate data for quantitative reporting. Patients with ST-elevation MI who experienced longer (>90 min) door-to-balloon delay had a higher risk of short-term mortality (pooled OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.65) and medium-term to long-term mortality (pooled OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.06). A non-linear time–risk relation was observed (P=0.004 for non-linearity). The association between longer door-to-balloon delay and short-term mortality differed between those presented early and late after symptom onset (Cochran’s Q 3.88, P value 0.049) with a stronger relationship among those with shorter prehospital delays. Conclusion Longer door-to-balloon delay in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation MI is related to higher risk of adverse outcomes. Prehospital delays modified this effect. The non-linearity of the time–risk relation might explain the lack of population effect despite an improved door-to-balloon time in the USA.en
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number16en
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312517en
dc.description.volume104en
dc.format.extent1362–1369en
dc.identifier.citationFoo, C.Y., Bonsu, K.O., Nallamothu, B.K., Reid, C.M., Dhippayom, T., Reidpath, D.D. and Chaiyakunapruk, N. (2018) ‘Coronary intervention door-to-balloon time and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis’, Heart, 104(16), pp. 1362–1369. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312517.en
dc.identifier.issn1355-6037en
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12886
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312517
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen
dc.relation.ispartofHearten
dc.titleCoronary intervention door-to-balloon time and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
qmu.centreInstitute for Global Health and Developmenten
refterms.accessExceptionNAen
refterms.depositExceptionNAen
refterms.panelUnspecifieden
refterms.technicalExceptionNAen
refterms.versionNAen
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen

Files