Repository logo
 

Centre for Academic Practice

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/29

Browse

Filters

1998 - 19992

Settings

Start date: 1998End date: 1999

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The importance of task appropriateness in computer-supported collaborative learning
    (Routledge, 1999) Buckner, K.; Morss, K.
    Collaborative learning activities can be beneficial for exchanging ideas, sharing experiences, and developing shared understanding. It is our view that the task given to the student is central to the success or otherwise of the learning experience. In this paper, we discuss the need for the adaptation of traditional face-to-face tasks when these are incorporated in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments. We focus on critical issues in relation to the implementation of CSCL tasks including: the appropriateness of the medium for the task, the role of individuals, the volume of work involved, the time allocated for tasks or sub-tasks, and, the assessment procedures. In this paper we describe and evaluate two case studies that illustrate the importance of the appropriateness of the task in computer-supported co-operative learning. Both case studies (taught by one of the authors) involve final-year Information Management undergraduates in on-campus modules. Our findings indicate that the task must allow the module outcomes to be achieved (and assessed if necessary), and must be supported by software tools which facilitate effective student learning. If it does, and the assessment mechanism is appropriate, the benefits include improved motivation to participate in discussion, improved student learning, and the ability to assess individual performance in group activities.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Discipline-based academic development through a tripartite partnership
    (Routledge, 1998-11) Morss, K.; Donaghy, Marie
    This paper describes a discipline-based academic development project based upon a tripartite relationship between departmental staff, work-based practitioners and the central academic development unit which took place over one academic year within the Department of Physiotherapy, Queen Margaret College, Edinburgh. The purpose of the project was to discuss and debate the concept of the 'reflective practitioner', to develop strategies for enabling undergraduate students to be reflective, and to devise a framework for assessment of reflective practice in clinical work-based learning. The outcomes of the project, most important of which was a change in the learning experience for students, demonstrate that academic development can be valuable and productive when undertaken as a partnership and placed in a disciplinary context. The authors identify key elements important to the success of the academic development process which should be applicable in similar situations and which could serve as guidelines for the planning and delivery of staff development through similar kinds of partnerships.