Nursing
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/24
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Testing Realist Programme Theories on the Contribution of Lean Six Sigma to Person-Centred Cultures: A Comparative Study in Public and Private Acute Hospitals(MDPI, 2025-09-04) Teeling, Sean Paul; Baldie, Deborah; Daly, Ailish; Pierce, Anthony; Wolfe, Nicola; Fagan, Gillian; Garry, CatherinePerson-centred cultures are increasingly recognised as essential to the delivery of compassionate, safe, and effective healthcare. While Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is widely adopted as a process improvement methodology, its application is often critiqued for lacking alignment with relational or values-based care. This study aimed to test the transferability of three previously developed Programme Theories (PTs), generated through realist inquiry in a public hospital setting, within a large private acute hospital. Realist-informed adjudication workshops were conducted with interdisciplinary staff who had completed university-accredited training in LSS. Structured workbooks, visual artefacts, and thematic synthesis were used to identify how context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOCs) held, shifted, or evolved in the new setting. All three PTs were confirmed, with six CMOCs refined, and eight new configurations generated. Key refinements included the role of strategic intent, informal improvement communities, and intrinsic motivation. These findings suggest that values-based mechanisms underpinning person-centred LSS are not confined to public systems and may be equally active in private settings. The study confirms the explanatory strength of the original PTs while contributing new insights into their adaptability. It offers practical guidance for healthcare leaders seeking to embed person-centred improvement approaches across diverse systems, regardless of sectoral funding or governance structures.Item Developing new methods for person-centred approaches to adjudicate context−mechanism−outcome configurations in realist evaluation(MDPI, 2022-02-18) Teeling, Sean Paul; Dewing, Jan; Baldie, DeborahRealist evaluation provides a general method of evaluating the application of interventions including policy, legislation, projects, and new processes in social settings such as law enforcement, healthcare and education. Realist evaluation focuses on what about interventions works, for whom, and in what circumstances, and there is a growing body of work using realist evaluation to analyse interventions in healthcare organizations, including those using Lean Six Sigma improvement methodologies. Whilst realist evaluation facilitates the analysis of interventions using both qualitative and quantitative research, there is little guidance given on methods of data collection and analysis. The purpose of this study is to address this lack of guidance through detailing the use of innovative person-centred methods of data collection and analysis in a realist evaluation that enabled us to understand the contribution of Lean Six Sigma to person-centred care and cultures. This use of person-centred principles in the adjudication of identified program theories has informed novel methods of collecting and analysing data in realist evaluation that facilitate a person-centred approach to working with research participants and a way of making the implicit explicit when adjudicating program theory.Item A realist inquiry to identify the contribution of Lean Six Sigma to person-centred care and cultures(MDPI, 2021-10-03) Teeling, Sean Paul; Dewing, Jan; Baldie, DeborahA lack of fidelity to Lean Six Sigma’s (LSS) philosophical roots can create division between person-centred approaches to transforming care experiences and services, and system wide quality improvement methods focused solely on efficiency and clinical outcomes. There is little research into, and a poor understanding of, the mechanisms and processes through which LSS education influences healthcare staffs’ person-centred practice. This realist inquiry asks ‘whether, to what extent and in what ways, LSS in healthcare contributes to person-centred care and cultures’. Realist review identified three potential Context, Mechanism, Outcome configurations (CMOcs) explaining how LSS influenced practice, relating to staff, patients, and organisational influences. Realist evaluation was used to explore the CMOc relating to staff, showing how they interacted with a LSS education Programme (the intervention) with CMOc adjudication by the research team and study participants to determine whether, to what extent, and in what ways it influenced person-centred cultures. Three more focused CMOcs emerged from the adjudication of the CMOc relating to staff, and these were aligned to previously identified synergies and divergences between participants’ LSS practice and person-centred cultures. This enabled us to understand the contribution of LSS to person-centred care and cultures that contribute to the evidence base on the study of quality improvement beyond intervention effectiveness alone.