Nursing
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/24
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item The differences in experiences among multi-level healthcare leaders, between the first and the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Two cross-sectional studies compared(Dove Press, 2021-09-11) Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi; Zacho Borre, Line; Kjerholt, Mette; McCormack, Brendan; Rosted, ElizabethTo identify the differences in experiences during wave I and II of the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare leaders. It is expected, that working conditions for COVID-19-pandemic frontline staff will change, as health care organizations have gained experience with handling the consequences of the disease. An online survey was sent out to Danish health care leaders during the first and the second pandemic wave. Comparative analyses were performed in relation to three key characteristics: management level, management education and experiences as a leader. Eighty-nine health care leaders completed both surveys. Significant differences were found within the entire group across the key characteristics as they felt more prepared for each stage of the situation, they had more influence on the decisions taken, and they felt more concerned about the quality of treatment and care and their own health. Further significant results related to the three key characteristics were found at 1) Management level: The heads of department experienced being better informed, having more overview of their tasks and that these were meaningful. The ward managers experienced being more able to work in consistency with own beliefs and values, though they felt more overloaded. 2) Level of management education: Leaders, without a formal management education, experienced being more supported by staff. 3) Years of experiences as leader: Leaders with more than five years of experience, experienced being more prepared and informed, had more influence on decision-making, and were more worried about their own health. The learning from experience that happens naturally in crisis situations is the reason why the leaders feel more prepared. However, there is a need for further leadership and practice development, to create contexts where leaders feel more ready for all aspects of their role. [Abstract copyright: © 2021 Hølge-Hazelton et al.]Item Improving person-centred leadership: A qualitative study of ward managers' experiences during the COVID-19 crisis(Dove Press, 2021-04-07) Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi; Kjerholt, Mette; Rosted, Elizabeth; Thestrup Hansen, Stine; Zacho Borre, Line; McCormack, BrendanIn order to provide guidance and prepare ward managers for future crisis situations similar to the COVID-19 pandemic, the aim of this study was to reflect and learn how person-centred nursing leadership may be strengthened in such situations. The pandemic has forced nurse leaders to face new challenges. Knowledge about their experiences may contribute to advancing leadership practices in times of future crises. A qualitative directed content analysis was chosen. The theoretical perspective was person-centred leadership. Thirteen ward managers from a Danish university hospital were included and interviewed using telephone interviews three months after the first national COVID-19 case was confirmed. The main findings of the study revealed that the ward managers often experienced a lack of timely, relevant information, involvement in decision-making and acknowledgement from the head nurse of department and the executive management. This was caused by the existing organizational cultures and the traditional hierarchy of communication. This meant that the ward managers' sense of own competences and leadership values and beliefs came under high pressure when they had to balance different stakeholders' needs. When the experience of ward managers results in them being unable to lead authentically and competently in a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic, lack of engagement can occur, with serious consequences for patients, staff and the ward managers themselves. Traditional organizational cultures that are hierarchical and controlling needs to be challenged and reoriented towards collaborative, inclusive and participative practices of engagement and involvement. Leadership development must be an established and integrated component of organizations, so that ward managers are able to sustain person-centred ways of being and doing in times of crisis.Item Health professional frontline leaders' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study(Dove Press, 2021-01-19) Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi; Kjerholt, Mette; Rosted, Elizabeth; Thestrup Hansen, Stine; Zacho Borre, Line; McCormack, BrendanThe aim was to identify the differences in experiences of Danish healthcare leaders in the beginnning of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and to generate knowledge for future leadership during and post crises. The global spread of COVID-19 has affected healthcare systems worldwide and has forced healthcare leaders to face challenges few were prepared for. It is expected that the pandemic may hit in several waves within the next year and therefore healthcare leaders must be prepared for these waves. An online survey was developed, and comparative analyses were performed. One hundred and sixty hospital leaders were invited, and 72% completed the questionnaire. Significant differences were found within three selected characteristics: 1) Management level: significantly more heads of departments experienced taking complex decisions ( =0.05), being able to work in a way consistent with their beliefs and values ( =0.05), and they were less likely to experience that collaboration with other leaders was adversely affected by the COVID-19 situation compared to ward managers ( =0.04). On the other hand, ward managers were significantly more often worried about both their own health ( =0.01) and their family's health ( =0.04). 2) Management education: those with a formal management education more often experienced having the managerial competences to effectively manage the COVID-19 situation ( =0.00), and performing meaningful tasks during the situation ( =0.04). 3) Years of experience: significantly more leaders with more than five years of experience identified having the managerial competences to effectively manage the situation ( =0.01). Leadership support during a healthcare crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic should strategically focus on ward managers, leaders with no formal management education and leaders with less than two years of experience. Hospital leaders may use this knowledge to re-contextualize what is already known about targeted leadership support during healthcare crises and to act accordingly. [Abstract copyright: © 2021 Hølge-Hazelton et al.]Item Danish translation and adaptation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI) with implications for evidence-based practice(Wiley, 2019-01-28) Hølge-Hazelton, Bibi; Bucknall, Tracey; Bruun, Line Zacho; Slater, Paul F.; McCormack, Brendan; Klausen, Susanne Hwiid; Thomsen, Thora SkodshøjBackground: Healthcare contexts are rapidly changing with growing demand for health services to accommodate an ageing population and financial pressures. Assessment of context in healthcare set-tings has been the subject of increasing debate. The Context Assessment Index (CAI) examines three interconnected contextual elements derived from the PARIHS-Framework with the purpose of providing practitioners with an understanding of the context in which they work. Aims: 1: To describe the translation of the CAI into Danish and adapt the instrument for use in Danish hospitals. 2: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Danish version of the CAI. Methods: Translation and adaption included an expert panel and a translation/back-translation pro-cess. The CAI was then sent to 4416 nurses in the Region Zealand, Denmark. There are two alternative measurement models to explain the factor structure of the CAI, the five-factor model and the three-factor model. In order to provide the best explanation for the data both measurement models were examined using confirmatory factor analysis. Results: The CAI was translated and modified based on expert review and usability testing. 2261 nurses completed the CAI. For both models, factor loadings and fit statistics were acceptable, appropriate and statistically significant, and the measurement models were confirmed (5-factor model RMSEA 0.07, CFI=0.923; 3-factor model RMSEA 0.07, CFI=0.924). Cronbach alpha scores showed the models to have broadly acceptable scores (5-factor 0.64 – 0.89; 3-factor model 0.72 – 0.89). Linking Evidence to Action: The three-factor model can advantageously be used when the PARIHS framework is part of the project. In a translation process, differences in cultural specificity, language, and working environment have to be considered. By understanding the context of practice, nurses may enable person-centered care and improve patient outcomes.