Nursing
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/24
Browse
10 results
Search Results
Item Testing Realist Programme Theories on the Contribution of Lean Six Sigma to Person-Centred Cultures: A Comparative Study in Public and Private Acute Hospitals(MDPI, 2025-09-04) Teeling, Sean Paul; Baldie, Deborah; Daly, Ailish; Pierce, Anthony; Wolfe, Nicola; Fagan, Gillian; Garry, CatherinePerson-centred cultures are increasingly recognised as essential to the delivery of compassionate, safe, and effective healthcare. While Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is widely adopted as a process improvement methodology, its application is often critiqued for lacking alignment with relational or values-based care. This study aimed to test the transferability of three previously developed Programme Theories (PTs), generated through realist inquiry in a public hospital setting, within a large private acute hospital. Realist-informed adjudication workshops were conducted with interdisciplinary staff who had completed university-accredited training in LSS. Structured workbooks, visual artefacts, and thematic synthesis were used to identify how context–mechanism–outcome configurations (CMOCs) held, shifted, or evolved in the new setting. All three PTs were confirmed, with six CMOCs refined, and eight new configurations generated. Key refinements included the role of strategic intent, informal improvement communities, and intrinsic motivation. These findings suggest that values-based mechanisms underpinning person-centred LSS are not confined to public systems and may be equally active in private settings. The study confirms the explanatory strength of the original PTs while contributing new insights into their adaptability. It offers practical guidance for healthcare leaders seeking to embed person-centred improvement approaches across diverse systems, regardless of sectoral funding or governance structures.Item The contribution of a person-centred model of Lean Six Sigma to the development of a healthful culture of health systems improvement(Frontiers Media, 2025-08-18) Teeling, Sean Paul; Baldie, Deborah; Daly, Ailish; Keown, Anne Marie; Igoe, Aileen; Dowling, Ciara; McNamara, MartinBackground: A failure to distinguish between person-centredness, person-centred care, and person-centred cultures can result in improvement initiatives focusing solely on improvement initiative metrics and outcomes, excluding the authentic experiences of patients and staff. Building on the foundational work of Dewing and McCormack, we have designed, piloted, and implemented the Person-centred Lean Six Sigma (PCLSS) model in public and private acute and community healthcare settings across Ireland. This model uses Lean Six Sigma, a widely adopted improvement methodology, through a person-centred lens with which improvement practitioners and healthcare staff can inspect their Lean Six Sigma practice and critically evaluate whether, to what extent, and how it is synergistic with person-centred approaches. Aim: This paper explores the deployment of the PCLSS model across four clinical study sites and examines its alignment with McCance and McCormack's conceptual work on healthful cultures, evaluating its contribution to creating cultures that support sustainable improvement, compassion, and respect. Methods: The PCLSS model was embedded within a university-accredited education programme for healthcare staff. The model was applied across four distinct healthcare settings in Ireland: a public acute teaching hospital, a private full-service acute hospital, an integrated ophthalmology service bridging hospital and community care, and a public rehabilitation hospital. A case study methodology was used to examine implementation and impact. Results: Across all four sites, the PCLSS model facilitated improvements in operational efficiency, staff and patient engagement, interprofessional collaboration, and reflective practice. The model supported leadership at all levels, fostered sustainable change, and successfully mapped onto key domains associated with healthful cultures, as articulated in the work of McCance and McCormack. Conclusion: The PCLSS model represents a sustainable, values-based approach to improvement that aligns operational excellence with person-centred principles. Its application contributes meaningfully to the development of healthful cultures in healthcare organisations.Item Developing new methods for person-centred approaches to adjudicate context−mechanism−outcome configurations in realist evaluation(MDPI, 2022-02-18) Teeling, Sean Paul; Dewing, Jan; Baldie, DeborahRealist evaluation provides a general method of evaluating the application of interventions including policy, legislation, projects, and new processes in social settings such as law enforcement, healthcare and education. Realist evaluation focuses on what about interventions works, for whom, and in what circumstances, and there is a growing body of work using realist evaluation to analyse interventions in healthcare organizations, including those using Lean Six Sigma improvement methodologies. Whilst realist evaluation facilitates the analysis of interventions using both qualitative and quantitative research, there is little guidance given on methods of data collection and analysis. The purpose of this study is to address this lack of guidance through detailing the use of innovative person-centred methods of data collection and analysis in a realist evaluation that enabled us to understand the contribution of Lean Six Sigma to person-centred care and cultures. This use of person-centred principles in the adjudication of identified program theories has informed novel methods of collecting and analysing data in realist evaluation that facilitate a person-centred approach to working with research participants and a way of making the implicit explicit when adjudicating program theory.Item The use of Lean Six Sigma methodology in the reduction of patient length of stay following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery(MDPI, 2022-01-30) Moffatt, Sinead; Garry, Catherine; McCann, Hannah; Teeling, Sean Paul; Ward, Marie; McNamara, MartinBackground: The purpose of this study was to reduce the length of stay of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients within a private hospital in Ireland, reducing any non-value-added activity in the patient pathway, with the goal of increasing patient flow, bed capacity, and revenue generation within the hospital system, while maintaining patient satisfaction. Methods: We used a pre-/post-intervention design and Lean Six Sigma methods and tools to assess and improve the current process. Results: A reduction in inpatient length of stay by 57%, and a reduction in identified non-value-added activity by 88%, resulted in a new day-case surgery pathway for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients. The pathway evidenced no re-admissions and demonstrated patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Six months post-project commencement, we had successfully achieved our goals of reducing our anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patient’s length of stay. This study contributes to the growing body of published evidence which shows that adopting a Lean Six Sigma approach can be successfully employed to optimise care and surgical pathways in healthcare.Item A case study of a whole system approach to improvement in an acute hospital setting(MDPI, 2022-01-22) Ward, Marie E.; Daly, Ailish; McNamara, Martin; Garvey, Suzanne; Teeling, Sean PaulChanges in healthcare tend to be project-based with whole system change, which acknowledges the interconnectedness of socio-technical factors, not the norm. This paper attempts to address the question of whole system change posed by the special issue and brings together other research presented in this special issue. A case study approach was adopted to understand the deployment of a whole system change in the acute hospital setting along four dimensions of a socio-technical systems framework: culture, system functioning, action, and sense-making. The case study demonstrates evidence of whole system improvement. The approach to change was co-designed by staff and management, projects involving staff from all specialities and levels of seniority were linked to each other and to the strategic objectives of the organisation, and learnings from first-generation projects have been passed to second and third-generation process improvements. The socio-technical systems framework was used retrospectively to assess the system change but could also be used prospectively to help healthcare organisations develop approaches to whole system improvement.Item Redesigning the process for scheduling elective orthopaedic surgery: A combined Lean Six Sigma and person-centred approach(MDPI, 2021-11-13) Daly, Ailish; Wolfe, Nicola; Teeling, Sean Paul; Ward, Marie; McNamara, MartinThe Health Service Executive Ireland model of care for elective surgery supports the delivery of elective surgical care in achieving both process and clinical outcomes. This project was conducted in the Orthopaedic Department. Following an outpatient consultation with an orthopaedic surgeon, patients who required surgical intervention were scheduled for their intervention by the administrative team. Prior to commencing this project, the average time from patient consultation to being scheduled for surgery on the hospital system was 62 h/2.58 days. A pre- and post-team-based intervention design employing Lean Six Sigma methodology was applied to redesign the process for scheduling elective orthopaedic surgery. The project was informed by collaborative, inclusive, and participatory stakeholder engagement. The goal was to streamline the scheduling process for elective orthopaedic surgery, with a target that 90% of surgeries are scheduled “right first time” within 48 h/two working days of the outpatient consultant appointment. The main outcome measures showed that 100% of orthopaedic surgeries were scheduled successfully within 2 days of outpatient appointment. Duplication in work between patient services and scheduling teams was eliminated and facilitated a reduction in unnecessary staff workload. This project highlights the importance of collaborative interdisciplinary stakeholder engagement in the redesigning of processes to achieve sustainable outcomes, and the findings have informed further improvements across the hospital’s surgical scheduling system.Item Lean Six Sigma redesign of a process for healthcare mandatory education in basic life support—a pilot study(MDPI, 2021-11-06) Dempsey, Anne; Robinson, Ciara; Moffatt, Niamh; Hennessy, Therese; Bradshaw, Annmarie; Teeling, Sean Paul; Ward, Mari; McNamara, MartinHealthcare staff are required to undertake mandatory training programs to ensure they maintain key clinical competencies. This study was conducted in a private hospital in Ireland, where the processes for accessing mandatory training were found to be highly complex and non-user friendly, resulting in missed training opportunities, specific training license expiration, and underutilized training slots which resulted in lost time for both the trainers and trainees. A pilot study was undertaken to review the process for accessing mandatory training with a focus on the mandatory training program of Basic Life Support (BLS). This was chosen due to its importance in patient resuscitation and its requirement in the hospital achieving Joint Commission International (JCI) accreditation. A pre- and post-team-based intervention design was used with Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology employed to redesign the process of booking, scheduling, and delivery of BLS training leading to staff individual BLS certification for a period of two years. The redesign of the BLS training program resulted in a new blended delivery method, and the initiation of a pilot project led to a 50% increase in the volume of BLS classes and a time saving of 154 h 30 min for staff and 48 h 14 min for BLS instructors. The success of the BLS process access pilot has functioned as a platform for the redesign of other mandatory education programs and will be of interest to hospitals with mandatory training requirements that are already facing healthcare challenges and demands on staff time.Item Using Lean Six Sigma to redesign the supply chain to the operating room department of a private hospital to reduce associated costs and release nursing time to care(MDPI, 2021-10-20) O’Mahony, Lisa; McCarthy, Kerrie; O’Donoghue, Josephine; Teeling, Sean Paul; Ward, Marie; McNamara, MartinContinuity of the supply chain is an integral element in the safe and timely delivery of health services. Lean Six Sigma (LSS), a continuous improvement approach, aims to drive efficiencies and standardisation in processes, and while well established in the manufacturing and supply chain industries, also has relevance in healthcare supply chain management. This study outlines the application of LSS tools and techniques within the supply chain of an Operating Room (OR) setting in a private hospital in Dublin, Ireland. A pre-/post-intervention design was employed following the Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control (DMAIC) framework and applying LSS methodology to redesign the current process for stock management both within the OR storage area and within a pilot OR suite, through collaborative, inclusive, and participatory engagement with staff. A set of improvements were implemented to standardise and streamline the stock management in both areas. The main outcomes from the improvements implemented were an overall reduction in the value of stock held within the operating theatre by 17.7%, a reduction in the value of stock going out of date by 91.7%, and a reduction in the time spent by clinical staff preparing stock required for procedures by 45%, all demonstrating the effectiveness of LSS in healthcare supply chain management.Item The use of Lean Six Sigma for improving availability of and access to emergency department data to facilitate patient flow(MDPI, 2021-10-20) Daly, Ailish; Teeling, Sean Paul; Ward, Marie; McNamara, Martin; Robinson, CiaraThe aim of this study was to redesign an emergency department [ED] data management system to improve the availability of, and access to, data to facilitate patient flow. A pre-/post-intervention design was employed using Lean Six Sigma methodology with a focus on the voice of the customer, Gemba, and 5S to identify areas for improvement in ED data management processes and to inform solutions for improved ED patient flow processes. A multidisciplinary ED team includes medical consultants and registrars, nurses, patient service staff, radiology staff, as well as information technology and hospital management staff. Lean Six Sigma [LSS] diagnostic tools identified areas for improvement in the current process for data availability and access. A set of improvements were implemented to redesign the pathway for data collection in the ED to improve data availability and access. We achieved a reduction in the time taken to access ED patient flow data from a mean of 9 min per patient pre-intervention to immediate post-intervention. This enabled faster decision-making by the ED team related to patient assessment and treatment and informed improvements in patient flow. Optimizing patient flow through a hospital’s ED is a complex task involving collaboration and participation from multiple disciplines. Through the use of LSS methodology, we improved the availability of, and fast access to, accurate, current information regarding ED patient flow. This allows ED and hospital management teams to identify and rapidly respond to actions impacting patient flow.Item A realist inquiry to identify the contribution of Lean Six Sigma to person-centred care and cultures(MDPI, 2021-10-03) Teeling, Sean Paul; Dewing, Jan; Baldie, DeborahA lack of fidelity to Lean Six Sigma’s (LSS) philosophical roots can create division between person-centred approaches to transforming care experiences and services, and system wide quality improvement methods focused solely on efficiency and clinical outcomes. There is little research into, and a poor understanding of, the mechanisms and processes through which LSS education influences healthcare staffs’ person-centred practice. This realist inquiry asks ‘whether, to what extent and in what ways, LSS in healthcare contributes to person-centred care and cultures’. Realist review identified three potential Context, Mechanism, Outcome configurations (CMOcs) explaining how LSS influenced practice, relating to staff, patients, and organisational influences. Realist evaluation was used to explore the CMOc relating to staff, showing how they interacted with a LSS education Programme (the intervention) with CMOc adjudication by the research team and study participants to determine whether, to what extent, and in what ways it influenced person-centred cultures. Three more focused CMOcs emerged from the adjudication of the CMOc relating to staff, and these were aligned to previously identified synergies and divergences between participants’ LSS practice and person-centred cultures. This enabled us to understand the contribution of LSS to person-centred care and cultures that contribute to the evidence base on the study of quality improvement beyond intervention effectiveness alone.