Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Podiatry
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Podiatry
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    It’s time we talked about Charcot foot: Results of a podiatry patient education questionnaire

    View/Open
    Accepted Version (347.9Kb)
    Date
    2019-09-01
    Author
    Bullen, Benjamin
    Young, Matthew
    McArdle, Carla
    Ellis, Mairghread JH
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Bullen, B., Young, M., McArdle, C. & Ellis, M. J. H. (2019) It’s time we talked about Charcot foot: Results of a podiatry patient education questionnaire. The Diabetic Foot Journal, 22(3), pp. 12-17.
    Abstract
    In contrast with diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) and lower-extremity amputation (LEA), current Scottish patient information leaflets reserve Charcot foot education for individuals ‘In Remission’ from, or with active, Charcot foot. A small group of Scottish NHS podiatrists recently agreed Charcot foot education should be delivered to all ‘At-risk’ individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This study sought to compare discussion about diabetes foot disease and Charcot foot between ‘At-risk’ and ‘In Remission’ groups among this cohort. Fourteen participants completed an ‘At-risk’ component of the Charcot foot patient education questionnaire, while six also completed an ‘In Remission’ component. Topics investigated for both groups included DFU and LEA risk, footwear and insoles, and signs of infection and Charcot foot. Frequency of discussion data was captured with a five-point Likert scale. Median response and interquartile range (IQR) were described and compared between groups. Median values and IQR for discussion of DFU and LEA risk were 5 (IQR 1) and 3 (IQR 1.25) respectively for ‘At-risk’ groups, and 5 (IQR 0.25) and 3 (IQR 2), respectively, among the ‘In Remission’ group. For discussion of footwear and insoles, the median response was 4 (IQR 1) for ‘At-risk’ and 5 (IQR 1) for ‘In Remission’ groups, reversed for discussion of signs of infection. The greatest between-group discrepancy was found for discussion of Charcot foot, with median responses and IQR found to be 3 (IQR 2) and 5 (IQR 0.25) for ‘At-risk’ and ‘In Remission’ groups, respectively. This discrepancy has potential implications for Charcot foot educational strategies, audit and research. It is proposed that ‘always’ should be the benchmark for frequency of Charcot foot education, not just for those ‘In Remission’ but also those ‘At risk’.
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/10078
    URI
    https://www.diabetesonthenet.com/journal/the-diabetic-foot-journal
    URI
    https://www.diabetesonthenet.com/journals/issue/590/article-details/its-time-we-talked-about-charcot-foot-results-of-a-podiatry-patient-education-questionnaire
    Collections
    • Podiatry

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap