Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Physiotherapy
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Physiotherapy
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Gait perturbations to discriminate between older adults with and without history of falls

    Date
    2017-06-29
    Author
    Roeles, Sanne
    Rowe, Philip
    Bruijn, Sjoerd
    Childs, Craig
    Tarfali, Georgia
    Steenbrink, Frans
    Pijnappels, Mirjam
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Roeles, S., Rowe, P., Bruijn, S., Childs, C., Tarfali, G., Steenbrink, F. & Pijnappels, M. (2017) Gait perturbations to discriminate between older adults with and without history of falls. 2017 ISPGR World Congress, June 25 to June 29, 2017. Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
    Abstract
    BACKGROUND AND AIM: While falls among older adults are considered a major health problem, the sensitivity of conventional fall risk assessments to identify individuals at risk is poor [1]. Among the main risk factors for falls are balance and gait impairments [2]. The ability to resist or recover from gait perturbations to prevent falling requires fast and accurate responses and might discriminate between fallers and non-fallers. We therefore investigated the ability to discriminate between older adults with and without history of falls using medio-lateral and anterior-posterior gait perturbations. METHODS: Twenty-five older adults (14 females; 74.0±11.1 years of age) walked at a fixed treadmill speed (1.03±0.20 m/s) on the GRAIL (Motekforce Link BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Trunk and lower limb kinematics were collected (Vicon, Oxford, UK) during steady state walking and in response to four types of perturbations: ipsi-lateral and contra-lateral platform sway and unilateral belt acceleration and deceleration. Maximum pelvic velocity per step in the medio-lateral and anterior-posterior direction was calculated during baseline walking and the first step after each perturbation. Participants were categorized as fallers or non-fallers based on their self-reported fall history over the past 12 months. Additionally, falls efficacy score (FES), physical activity questionnaire (PAQ), one-legged stance test (OLST) and the timed up and go (TUG) test were assessed. Differences between fallers and non-fallers were analysed using one-way ANOVAs. RESULTS: Seven participants (28%) reported at least one fall in the past 12 months and were categorized as fallers. Fallers showed significantly lower maximum pelvic velocity in response to the deceleration perturbation compared to non-fallers (F=5.651; p=0.026). No significant differences in maximum pelvic velocity were found during baseline walking and for the other perturbation types (Figure 1). Moreover, no significant differences were found between fallers and nonfallers for the conventional measures (i.e. the FES, PAQ, OLST and TUG). CONCLUSIONS: We successfully discriminated fallers from non-fallers based on the recovery from deceleration perturbations, while we were not able to do so by means of the conventional measures. Fallers had more difficulties in maintaining walking speed as indicated by the lower maximum pelvic velocity. On average, their maximum pelvic velocity was negative, meaning that their position on the treadmill became more rearward after the deceleration perturbation. Therefore, assessing the ability to recover from deceleration perturbations may be used to identify fall risk in older adults. The added value of other perturbation outcomes and strategies to recover from perturbations will be discussed. [1] Gates S. et al. (2008). J Rehabil Res Dev, 45(8): 1105-16. [2] Ambrose, AF et al. (2013). Maturitas, 75(1): 51-61.
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/10175
    URI
    https://ispgr.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2017Abstracts.pdf
    URI
    https://ispgr.org/past-congresses/
    Collections
    • Physiotherapy

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap