Acceptability and use of a patient-held communication tool for people living with dementia: A longitudinal qualitative study
View/ Open
Date
2020-05-05Author
Leavey, Gerard
Corry, Dagmar
Waterhouse-Bradley, Bethany
Curran, Emma
Todd, Stephen
McIlfatrick, Sonja
Coates, Vivien
Watson, Max
Abbott, Aine
McCrory, Bernadine
McCormack, Brendan
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Leavey, G., Corry, D., Waterhouse-Bradley, B., Curran, E., Todd, S., McIlfatrick, S., Coates, V., Watson, M., Abbott, A., McCrory, B. & McCormack, B. (2020) Acceptability and use of a patient-held communication tool for people living with dementia: A longitudinal qualitative study. BMJ Open, 10:e036249.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the acceptability and use of a low-cost patient-held
communication tool. Design: Longitudinal Qualitative interviews at three time points over 18
months and document content analysis Setting: Primary and community services Participants: Twenty-eight dyads - People living with dementia in
Northern Ireland and their informal carers. Interventions: a patient-held healthcare “passport” for people living with
dementia. Primary and secondary outcomes: acceptability and use of the
passport – barriers and facilitators to successful engagement. Results: There was a qualified appreciation of the healthcare passport
and a much more nuanced, individualistic or personalised approach to its
desirability and use. How people perceive it and what they actually do
with it, are strongly determined by individual contexts, dementia stage
and other health problems, social and family needs and capacities. We
noted concerns about privacy and ambivalence about engaging with
health professionals. Conclusion: Such tools may be of use but there is a need for demanding,
thoughtful, and nuanced programme delivery for future implementation in
dementia care. The incentivisation and commitment of General
Practitioners is crucial. Altering the asymmetrical relationship between
professionals and patients requires more extensive attention.