Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Nursing
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Nursing
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Designing and developing core physiology learning outcomes for pre-registration nursing education curriculum

    View/Open
    Accepted Version (406.7Kb)
    Date
    2020-08-14
    Author
    Wood, Alison
    Chandler, Colin
    Connolly, Siobhan
    Finn, Gabrielle
    Redmond, Catherine
    Jolly, Jim
    Powell, Andrew D.
    Davies, Carmel
    Grant, Allison
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Wood, A., Chandler, C., Connolly, S., Finn, G., Redmond, C., Jolly, J., Powell, A. D., Davies, C. & Grant, A. (2020) Designing and developing core physiology learning outcomes for pre-registration nursing education curriculum. Advances in Physiology Education, 44(3), pp. 464-474.
    Abstract
    Physiology is a key element of “bioscience” education within pre-registration nursing programs, but there is a lack of clarity on what is included. Physiology and bioscience content and delivery are highly varied across both higher education institutions and the related programs in the United Kingdom (UK). Despite evidence highlighting concerns over nurses’ lack of bioscience knowledge and unsafe practice, there is no universally agreed on curriculum with detailed outcomes of minimum levels of knowledge to support nurses in practice and patient care. This study aimed to inform the construction of discipline-specific physiology learning outcomes to clarify relevant physiological topics required in pre-registration nursing. Initially, 360 learning outcomes were identified from various sources. Using a modified Delphi approach, an expert panel from the Bioscience in Nurse Education group reviewed and modified the list to 195 proposed outcomes. These were circulated to universities in the UK who teach nursing (n = 65). Outcomes that had 80% consensus were automatically included in the next round, with others recommended with modification (response rate 22%). The panel reviewed the modifications, and 182 outcomes were circulated in the second questionnaire (response rate 23%), and further panel review resulting in 177 outcomes agreed. These learning outcomes do not suggest how they should be delivered, but gives the basic level required for qualification as a nurse commensurate with the Nursing and Midwifery Council new standards for the “future nurse.”
    Official URL
    https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00139.2019
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/10946
    Collections
    • Nursing

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap