Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eTheses
    • PhD
    • School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management
    • Business, Events and Hospitality
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eTheses
    • PhD
    • School of Arts, Social Sciences and Management
    • Business, Events and Hospitality
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Methods used by health ombudsman in their system improvement role: A comparison of two international health ombudsman in their system improvement role and the response of Scottish health boards to the system improvement activities of the SPSO

    View/Open
    11162.pdf (2.958Mb)
    Date
    2020
    Author
    McBurnie, Gavin
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Academics and ombudsman claim that a key role for ombudsman is to contribute to the improvement of the system over which they have oversight. However, there is limited research to support this claim and, much of what exists, is equivocal. This research examines the thesis that health ombudsman make a significant contribution to the improvement of the healthcare system as a result of the roles and activities that they undertake together with the way that they work with bodies in jurisdiction. In conducting this research, an international comparative case study was undertaken, using the Office of the Health Ombudsman, Queensland (OHOQ) and the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) as cases. In addition, three Scottish health boards participated in the research. The OHOQ was found not to be an ombudsman but to be a health complaint entity which principally focused on the prosecution of health professionals that it considers have conducted serious professional misconduct. The SPSO is an ombudsman, which principally tries to contribute to system improvement through compliance from health boards with recommendations arising from upheld complaints. In its approach to complaint investigations, the SPSO adopts the positions of an accountability institutional logic and coercive model of administrative control. These positions adversely affect the relationship between the SPSO and health boards with health board participants complaining about the nature of the communication between themselves and the SPSO, the quality of the clinical advice relied upon by the SPSO in reaching its decisions, and the inability to challenge either the advice or the decision. Consequently, in many cases, compliance with SPSO recommendations was due to a fear of sanction rather than commitment. In implementing recommendations, health boards use a dominant informational mode of organisational learning. Together, these factors explain why learning is unsustained leading to repeated complaints about the same issue.
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/11162
    Collections
    • Business, Events and Hospitality

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap