Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Problematizing vulnerability: Unpacking gender, intersectionality, and the normative disaster paradigm

    Date
    2017-11-17
    Author
    Kadetz, Paul
    Mock, Nancy B.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Kadetz, P. and Mock, N.B. (2017) 'Problematizing vulnerability: Unpacking gender, intersectionality, and the normative disaster paradigm', in M.J. Zakour, N.B. Mock and P. Kadetz (eds.) Creating Katrina, Rebuilding Resilience: Lessons from New Orleans on Vulnerability and Resiliency. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 215-230.
    Abstract
    In crises, social exclusions thwart both access to resources and options out of vulnerability. Thus, sociocultural systems that privilege certain groups over others before a disaster ultimately produce the postdisaster vulnerability of those excluded groups. Yet, gender inequality and other forms of domination and exclusion have remained largely unexamined in US disaster research and interventions; which is often more concerned with technology and the rebuilding of physical infrastructure, than strengthening the social infrastructure. Dependence upon an essentialized depiction of vulnerability and “disaster victims,” while ignoring the predisaster social factors that engender and perpetuate inequality, exclusion, and lack of access to resources, serves to exacerbate the problem of postdisaster vulnerability. Thus, in order to address gendered and intersectional vulnerability in disasters, all of the complex factors contributing to vulnerability and inequality would need to be collectively assessed. But this would require analysis in disaster preparedness, recovery, and reconstruction that is far more specific than current aggregated groupings of sex, gender, and race/ethnicity. The complexity of gendered vulnerability through more complete data collection would provide a means to disaggregate gender via a series of criteria that include income, age, ethnicity, marriage status, sexual orientation, as well as other specific criteria, such as education, religion, disability and HIV-status. A response and recovery emphasis on strengthening local capacity of the most vulnerable in any group is essential. This chapter examines the intersections of gender, race, class, and other marginalized groups in the creation of postdisaster vulnerability in New Orleans. While pre-Katrina gendered vulnerability was stark, the lack of focus on the reduction of disparities provides important lessons for other contexts.
    Official URL
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809557-7.00009-0
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12411
    Collections
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap