Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    How context influences person-centred practice: a critical-creative case study examining the use of research evidence in occupational therapy with people living with dementia.

    View/Open
    Accepted Version (366.3Kb)
    Date
    2022-09-08
    Author
    Kinsella, Niamh
    Pentland, Duncan
    McCormack, Brendan
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    KINSELLA, N., PENTLAND, D., and MCCORMACK, B., 2022. How context influences person-centred practice: a critical-creative case study examining the use of research evidence in occupational therapy with people living with dementia. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, pp. 1–17.
    Abstract
    Occupational therapists are encouraged to use research evidence to guide therapeutic interventions that holistically address the consequences of dementia. Recent efforts to use research evidence in practice have emphasized the challenges of doing so in ways aligned to person-centred and professional principles. Using research evidence is a complex process influenced by multiple contextual factors and layers. The influence of context in occupational therapy for dementia is currently unclear. To explore the contextual complexities of using research evidence in practice with people with dementia, and to develop knowledge to improve the approach to using evidence in person-centred, occupation-focused practice. A case study methodology was used, in which the contextual conditions of practice were clarified through the facilitation of critical and creative reflection using the following methods - Think Aloud, practice observation, creative expression and reflective dialogue. Cultural beliefs that affected evidence use included technically-orientated understandings of evidence-based practice. These were underpinned by apprehensions about losing professional identity and taking risks when processes derived from research evidence were adjusted to incorporate a persons' occupations. These cultural factors were perpetuated at the organizational layers of context, where systemic priorities and other team members' needs disproportionately influenced occupational therapists' decisions. Occupational therapists' potential to make reflexive and responsive decisions by adjusting evidence-based processes can be affected by their perceived freedom to address organizational tensions. Raising consciousness of the influence of the organizational context on decision-making about evidence use could adjust occupational therapists' perceptions of their freedom and ability to be person-centred. Intentionality in reflective processes in practice are required to foster reflexivity.
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/12587
    Official URL
    https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2119162
    Collections
    • Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap