• Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Removing user fees: Learning from international experience to support the process

    View/Open
    eResearch_2607.pdf (165.0Kb)
    Access
    restricted
    Date
    2011-11
    Author
    McPake, Barbara
    Brikci, N.
    Cometto, G.
    Schmidt, A.
    Araujo, Edson
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    McPake, B., Brikci, N., Cometto, G., Schmidt, A. & Araujo, E. (2011) Removing user fees: Learning from international experience to support the process, Health policy and planning, vol. 26, , pp. ii104-ii117,
    Abstract
    Removing user fees could improve service coverage and access, in particular among the poorest socio-economic groups, but quick action without prior preparation could lead to unintended effects, including quality deterioration and excessive demands on health workers. This paper illustrates the process needed to make a realistic forecast of the possible resource implications of a well-implemented user fee removal programme and proposes six steps for a successful policy change: (1) analysis of a country's initial position (including user fee level, effectiveness of exemption systems and impact of fee revenues at facility level); (2) estimation of the impact of user fee removal on service utilization; (3) estimation of the additional requirements for human resources, drugs and other inputs, and corresponding financial requirements; (4) mobilization of additional resources (both domestic and external) and development of locally-tailored strategies to compensate for the revenue gap and costs associated with increased utilization; (5) building political commitment for the policy reform; (6) communicating the policy change to all stakeholders. The authors conclude that countries that intend to remove user fees can maximize benefits and avoid potential pitfalls through the utilization of the approach and tools described.
    Type
    article
    Official URL
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr064
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/2607
    Collections
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Contact Us | Send Feedback