Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • CASL
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • CASL
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Learning Disability Liaison Nursing Services in south-east Scotland: A mixed-methods impact and outcome study

    View/Open
    eResearch%204606.pdf (361.3Kb)
    Date
    2012-12-01
    Author
    Brown, M.
    MacArthur, J.
    McKechanie, A.
    Mack, Siobhan
    Hayes, M.
    Fletcher, J.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Brown, M., MacArthur, J., McKechanie, A., Mack, S., Hayes, M. & Fletcher, J. (2012) Learning Disability Liaison Nursing Services in south-east Scotland: A mixed-methods impact and outcome study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(12), pp. 1161-1174.
    Abstract
    Background There have been significant concerns about the care and treatment of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) when attending general hospitals, which have led to inquiries that highlight service and systems failures. One response has been the development of Learning Disability Liaison Nursing (LDLN) Services across the UK that aim to ensure that additional, specialist support is available for patients, their carers and general healthcare professionals. Methods A mixed-methods study to investigate the impact of LDLN Services across four Scottish NHS boards was undertaken. In total, 323 referrals made over 18 months were analysed along with qualitative data drawn from interviews and focus groups with a sample of 85 participants including patients with ID (n = 5), carers (n = 16), primary care healthcare professionals (n = 39) and general hospital professionals (n = 19) and learning disability liaison nurses (n = 6). Results The referral patterns to the four liaison nursing services closely matched the known health needs of adults with ID, with common admissions being due to neurological, respiratory and gastrointestinal issues. The LDLN role was seen to be complex and impacted on three key areas: (i) clinical patient care; (ii) education and practice development; and (iii) strategic organisational developments. Specific patient outcomes were linked to issues relating to capacity and consent to treatment, fostering person-centred adjustments to care, augmenting communication and the liaison nurses acting as positive role models and ambassadors for people with ID. Conclusions The LDLN Services were valued by stakeholders by achieving person-centred outcomes. With their expert knowledge and skills, the liaison nurses had an important role in developing effective systems and processes within general hospital settings. The outcomes highlight the importance of supporting and promoting LDLN Services and the challenges in delivering the multifaceted elements of the role. There is a need to take account of the complex and multidimensional nature of the LDLN role and the possible tensions between achieving clinical outcomes, education and practice developments and organisational strategic initiatives.
    Official URL
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01511.x
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/4606
    Collections
    • CASL

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap