Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • School of Health Sciences
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    How do health workers experience and cope with shocks? Learning from four fragile and conflict-affected health systems in Uganda, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe and Cambodia

    View/Open
    Accepted version (151.5Kb)
    Date
    2017-11-11
    Author
    Witter, Sophie
    Wurie, Haja
    Chandiwana, Pamela
    Namakula, Justine
    So, Sovannarith
    Alonso-Garbayo, Alvaro
    Ssengooba, Freddie
    Raven, Joanna
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Witter, S., Wurie, H., Chandiwana, P., Namakula, J., So, S., Alonso-Garbayo, A., Ssengooba, F. and Raven, J. (2017) ‘How do health workers experience and cope with shocks? Learning from four fragile and conflict-affected health systems in Uganda, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe and Cambodia’, Health Policy and Planning, 32(suppl_3), pp. iii3–iii13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx112.
    Abstract
    This article is grounded in a research programme which set out to understand how to rebuild health systems post-conflict. Four countries were studied-Uganda, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe and Cambodia-which were at different distances from conflict and crisis, as well as having unique conflict stories. During the research process, the Ebola epidemic broke out in West Africa. Zimbabwe has continued to face a profound economic crisis. Within our research on health worker incentives, we captured insights from 128 life histories and in-depth interviews with a variety of staff that had remained in service. This article aims to draw together lessons from these contexts which can provide lessons for enhancing staff and therefore health system resilience in future, especially in similarly fragile and conflict-affected contexts. We examine the reported effects, both personal and professional, of the three different types of shock (conflicts, epidemics and prolonged political-economic crises), and how staff coped. We find that the impact of shocks and coping strategies are similar between conflict/post-conflict and epidemic contexts-particularly in relation to physical threats and psychosocial threats-while all three contexts create challenges and staff responses for working conditions and remuneration. Health staff showed considerable inventiveness and resilience, and also benefited from external assistance of various kinds, but there are important gaps which point to ways in which they should be better protected and supported in the future. Health systems are increasingly fragile and conflict-prone, and shocks are often prolonged or repeated. Resilience should not be taken for granted or used as an excuse for abandoning frontline health staff. Strategies should be in place at local, national and international levels to prepare for predictable crises of various sorts, rather than waiting for them to occur and responding belatedly, or relying on personal sacrifices by staff to keep services functioning.
    Official URL
    https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czx112
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/5034
    Collections
    • The Institute for Global Health and Development

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap