Queen Margaret University logo
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • Centre for Academic Practice
    • View Item
    •   QMU Repositories
    • eResearch
    • Centre for Academic Practice
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The importance of task appropriateness in computer-supported collaborative learning

    View/Open
    748.pdf (393.2Kb)
    Date
    1999
    Author
    Buckner, K.
    Morss, K.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Buckner, K. & Morss, K. (1999) The importance of task appropriateness in computer-supported collaborative learning, ALT-J, vol. 7, , pp. 33-38,
    Abstract
    Collaborative learning activities can be beneficial for exchanging ideas, sharing experiences, and developing shared understanding. It is our view that the task given to the student is central to the success or otherwise of the learning experience. In this paper, we discuss the need for the adaptation of traditional face-to-face tasks when these are incorporated in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments. We focus on critical issues in relation to the implementation of CSCL tasks including: the appropriateness of the medium for the task, the role of individuals, the volume of work involved, the time allocated for tasks or sub-tasks, and, the assessment procedures. In this paper we describe and evaluate two case studies that illustrate the importance of the appropriateness of the task in computer-supported co-operative learning. Both case studies (taught by one of the authors) involve final-year Information Management undergraduates in on-campus modules. Our findings indicate that the task must allow the module outcomes to be achieved (and assessed if necessary), and must be supported by software tools which facilitate effective student learning. If it does, and the assessment mechanism is appropriate, the benefits include improved motivation to participate in discussion, improved student learning, and the ability to assess individual performance in group activities.
    Official URL
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0968776990070106
    URI
    https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/748
    Collections
    • Centre for Academic Practice

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap

     

    Browse

    All QMU RepositoriesCommunities & CollectionsBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research CentreThis CollectionBy YearBy PersonBy TitleBy QMU AuthorBy Research Centre

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Queen Margaret University: Research Repositories
    Accessibility Statement | Repository Policies | Contact Us | Send Feedback | HTML Sitemap