Red flag screening for serious pathology presenting in cervical spine musculoskeletal disorders
MetadataShow full item record
Redmond, C. (2013) Red flag screening for serious pathology presenting in cervical spine musculoskeletal disorders, no. 292.
Aim To develop a list of red flag clinical indicators for possible serious pathology masquerading as, or presenting alongside, neck related musculoskeletal disorders in the adult population. Background Musculoskeletal physiotherapists provide assessment and treatment for pain and functional impairments relating to musculoskeletal disorders, such as back and neck pain. In order to apply safe and effective treatment to these conditions it is vitally important that any underlying serious complaints have been excluded. Clinical indicators known as 'red flags' have been developed for diagnostic triage in back pain to help identify serious underlying conditions, such as cancer and infection. Red flags for serious pathology in neck pain or neck related pathology has not received the same level of attention as red flags in back pain. A literature review identified inconsistent evidence for clinical tests and clinical indicators for serious pathology in neck related musculoskeletal disorders. This presents a serious clinical challenge for musculoskeletal physiotherapists. Method A mixed method study design was developed involving: a) Qualitative descriptive method through Physiotherapy focus group; and, b) Three round Delphi survey method involving consultant neurologists and consultant neurosurgeons. The Delphi method involves combined qualitative and quantitative data phases. Thematic content analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data. A combined descriptive and inferential (non-parametric) statistical analysis was used to analyse the quantitative data. Kendall's W (Kendall's coefficient of concordance) was used to evaluate the level of consensus across all participants for the quantitative phase of the Delphi method. Findings A list of neck related red flag clinical indicators within five specific categories were developed: 1. progressive pain; 2. cancer, infection, trauma; 3. neurological deficit (spinal cord compromise); 4. headache (associated with neck pain/stiffness); 5. brainstem, cervical arterial and cranial nerve dysfunctions. An increase in Kendall's W was demonstrated between Rounds 2 and 3 in four out of five categories, indicating an increase in consensus levels between participants. This process highlights the complexity of interpreting clinical features within musculoskeletal presentations.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Young women's attitudes to and perceptions of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), cervical cancer and cervical screening. Unknown author (Queen Margaret University, 2013)Studies consistently identify poor levels of knowledge and awareness of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), the intimate link to cervical cancer and cervical screening. In particular, knowledge of the HPV vaccine implemented in ...
What Is The Evidence For Effects Of Cervical And Elbow Mobilisations On Neurophysiology Of Pain In Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia? Unknown author (Queen Margaret University, 2013)Background Lateral epicondylalgia is a challenging condition to treat and in its chronic form is characterised by pain system changes. Cervical and Elbow mobilisations have been employed as interventions in the treatment ...
Exploration of the factors that influence the uptake of cervical cancer screening: the exploration of experiences among women (25 years and above) in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Unknown author (Queen Margaret University, 2013)Aim: To explore the factors influencing the uptake of cervical cancer (CC) screening among women (25years and above) in Ebonyi State, Nigeria Background: Research findings have shown that screening aids in the early detection ...