Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/25
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Are we getting better at identifying and diagnosing neurodivergent girls and women? Insights into sex ratios and age of diagnosis from clinical population data in Scotland(Sage, 2025) Maciver, Donald; Roy, Anusua Singh; Johnston, Lorna; Boilson, Marie; Curnow, Eleanor; Johnstone-Cooke, Victiora; Rutherford, MarionThis study examined differences in referral and diagnosis based on sex recorded at birth (hereafter, ‘sex’), using case notes from 408 individuals diagnosed by 30 multidisciplinary teams across Scotland. Analyses focused on male-to-female ratios and median ages at referral and diagnosis across attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism and intellectual disability. The lifespan male-to-female ratio across all diagnoses was 1.31, varying by category and age. In autism, the male-to-female ratio was 2.21 for children under 10 years, but there were more females in adolescence (male-to female ratio=0.79) and adulthood (male-to-female ratio=0.94). Across the lifespan, combining all diagnoses, females were referred later (median ages: 14.4 vs 19.7 years; p<0.001) and diagnosed later (median ages: 15.2 vs 20.2 years; p<0.001), indicating a 5-year delay. Among autistic children and adolescents, females were referred later (median age: 7.5 vs 10.5years; p=0.002) and diagnosed later (median age: 9.3 vs 11.9years; p=0.003). However, no significant differences were found in age of referral or diagnosis for autistic adults. Overall, the results indicate partial equalisation of sex ratios across the lifespan, pronounced asymmetry in younger age groups, andconsistent delays in referral and diagnosis ages for females.Item Waiting Times and Influencing Factors in Children and Adults Undergoing Assessment for Autism, ADHD, and Other Neurodevelopmental Differences(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2025-02-24) Maciver, Donald; Roy, Anusua Singh; Johnston, Lorna; Boilson, Marie; Curnow, Eleanor; Johnstone‐Cooke, Victoria; Rutherford, MarionThis study explored waiting times and the factors influencing them in child and adult populations undergoing assessment for autism, ADHD, and other neurodevelopmental differences. The analysis focused on a retrospective review of 408 cases with assessments completed between October 2021 and May 2022, conducted by 30 diagnosing teams in Scotland. Data included age, final diagnosis, demographics, medical and developmental history, contact frequency, and assessment service adherence to best‐practice standards. Waiting times were calculated, and relationships were analyzed using linear regression. Median waiting times were 525 days (IQR 329–857) for children/adolescents and 252 days (IQR 106–611) for adults. Only 20% of children's and 47% of adult assessments met the proposed 252‐day diagnostic time target. Autism and ADHD were the most common diagnoses. Receiving > 1 neurodevelopmental diagnosis on completion was uncommon. Demographic factors did not significantly affect waiting times. Children/adolescents with more complex developmental and medical histories experienced longer waits (100.3 weeks vs. 67.7 weeks; p < 0.001), while adults with similar histories had shorter waits (32.7 weeks vs. 57.4 weeks; p = 0.016). Adults with ADHD experienced longer waits than autistic adults (63.4 weeks vs. 38.6 weeks, p = 0.002). Adherence to best‐practice quality standards was associated with shorter waits for children (β = 0.27, p = 0.002), but the relationship between standard adherence at different stages and for adults was less clear. More frequent appointments correlated with shorter adult waits (33.7 weeks vs. 59.2 weeks, p = 0.015). Gender distribution was balanced among adults, but children's services included more boys. The study highlights long waits and the need for improvement in processes.Item A brief neuro-affirming resource to support school absences for autistic learners: development and program description(Frontiers Media, 2024-03-22) Johnston, Lorna; Maciver, Donald; Rutherford, Marion; Gray, Anna; Curnow, Eleanor; Utley, IzyBackground: Education should be inclusive, nurturing each individual’s potential, talents, and creativity. However, criticisms have emerged regarding support for autistic learners, particularly in addressing disproportionately high absence levels within this group. The demand for accessible, person-centered, neuro-affirming approaches is evident. This paper provides a program description of a structured absence support framework, developed and implemented during and following the Covid-19 pandemic. We detail creation, content, and implementation. Methods: We collaborated with stakeholders, reviewed literature and drew on existing theoretical frameworks to understand absence in autistic learners, and produced draft guidance detailing practical approaches and strategies for supporting their return to school. The final resource was disseminated nationally and made freely available online with a supporting program of work around inclusive practices. Results: The resource is rooted in neuro-affirming perspectives, rejecting reward-based systems and deficit models of autism. It includes key messages, case studies and a planning framework. It aims to cultivate inclusive practices with an autism-informed lens. The principles promoted include recognizing the child’s 24-hour presentation, parental partnership, prioritizing environmental modifications, and providing predictable, desirable and meaningful experiences at school. Feedback to date has been positive in terms of feasibility, face validity, and utility. Conclusion: This novel, freely available resource provides a concise, practical framework for addressing absence in autistic learners by cultivating a more inclusive, equitable, and supportive educational system in which autistic individuals can thrive.Item A qualitative investigation of a virtual community music and music therapy intervention: A Scottish–American collaboration(SAGE Publications, 2024-02-09) Quigley, Hannah; MacDonald, RaymondThis study investigates the experiences of people involved in a virtual intervention involving community music and music therapy for individuals with autism. The intervention blends conventional music therapy and community music approaches. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many community music and music therapy projects shifted to an online format and there is a resultant need to understand more about how virtual music interventions may be of benefit for individuals with autism. We report on the design, implementation, and outcomes of one such intervention. Over an 8-week period, community musicians and music therapists (music facilitators) based in Scotland and America delivered 16 music sessions, which were recorded using the Zoom software. During the sessions the participants wrote, performed, and recorded two songs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with two of the participants, using video elicitation techniques, and six of the facilitators. Data were analyzed thematically. The intervention was found to (1) enable participants to explore their personal narratives, (2) promote self-perceptions of achievement, and (3) provide evidence of mastery, creativity, and self-expression. An international collaboration made possible by technology enabled facilitators to work remotely and participants to make use of new opportunities for engagement. This article demonstrates how community music practices focusing on participation and music therapy approaches focusing on clinical outcomes can be integrated. We present the online environment as its own social milieu in which creativity and connection can be explored in new ways.