The Institute for Global Health and Development

Background: Fragile settings – marked by conflict and political, environmental, social, or economic crisis – present severe challenges to population health and the delivery of services. This is particularly the case for health conditions that require continuity of care such as non-communicable disease and mental ill-health. Objectives: To understand existing patterns of health seeking in relation to noncommunicable disease and mental health and the barriers to equitable access to quality provision. To then evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and quality of interventions designed to address these conditions in contexts of fragility. Design and methods: Building on a foundation of focused scoping reviews, we used participatory methods – including group model building – to map pathways of access to community and health system resources in relation to non-communicable diseases and mental health. We then used a range of surveys and key informant interviews to evaluate implemented interventions. In addition, we undertook a series of global reviews of relevant topics, such as conceptualisation of fragility, the role of trust in health-seeking for noncommunicable disease care in fragile settings, analysis of policy and funding priorities of global actors regarding non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries, and the political economy of NCD policy adoption and implementation at national level. Setting and participants: Field studies were focused at the district or governorate level in a range of fragile settings, including Lebanon, Sierra Leone, El Salvador and, latterly, Nigeria and Gaza. Participants included service users, (formal and informal) health providers and policy makers. Interventions: Interventions addressing NCDs included treatment protocols for hypertension and diabetes (with report cards and desk guides supporting primary care-based disease management) and a local co-created salt reduction programme (featuring community drama, school outreach and radio messaging). Mental health needs were primarily addressed in relation to the provision of community-based psychosocial support either through specific interventions (including a lay-woman-led problem solving intervention for perinatal women) or the development of assessment tools (such as a Participatory Assessment Tool for Mapping Social Connections) and contextually valid screening measures (including the Sierra Leone Psychological Distress Scale and the Sierra Leone Perinatal Psychological Distress Scale) to inform interventions. The programme also developed relevant training interventions. Main outcome measures: Measures focused on access to, and utilisation and quality of, services, including user perceptions of provision. Results: We identified a range of barriers to effective health provision in fragile settings. These reflected the cultural, political, social, economic particularities of the setting and its health system. However, trust (in specific health providers, within social and community networks, and in government) was consistently found to be a key factor in securing targeted outcomes. The skills, methods and confidence of providers was also found to be an important influence on such outcomes. Providing contextually relevant training, mentorship and tools equipped health providers in primary care settings to maintain effective, evidencebased management of diabetes and hypertension despite the ongoing challenges of their fragile context. Mobilisation of community-level resources to address non-communicable disease and mental health needs was demonstrated as relevant, feasible and potentially effective in all settings. Limitations: There was great diversity across the particular settings studied, as well as ongoing gaps in knowledge in relation to these conditions in particular. Caution should be shown in generalisation of specific findings to other situations that may not share important features. The COVID 19 pandemic disrupted data collection in both Sierra Leone and Lebanon, although the targeted power of studies was generally secured. More generally, the pandemic significantly impacted health systems operations in all settings studied, an influence that is discussed in all relevant papers. Conclusions: The research programme contributed to addressing gaps in the literature regarding effective tools and strategies to strengthen provision regarding mental health and non-communicable disease in fragile settings. Assessment of needs and barriers to accessing services is an important foundation for effective working in such contexts. This is achievable with research methods (such as group model building and remote data capture) that can accommodate the diverse challenges and uncertainty associated with these settings. Incorporating such information in service design – at the level of the community, health facility or policymaker – can secure improvement in access to, and quality of, important services. Donors and policy makers need to attend not just to the drivers of fragility but also to coherent investment in public health systems and in processes of community engagement if health needs are to be meaningfully addressed. Future work: The conceptualisation of fragility (and resilience) developed through this programme is informing the design of community, health system and wider cross-sectoral interventions in fragile contexts through the ReBuild for Resilience programme in settings including Sierra Leone, Lebanon, Myanmar and Nepal. Further work across diverse contexts of fragility is required to both identify common features and principles required for health response in these settings and refine strategies and tools that can readily be adapted to the unique characteristics of any particular context.

Introduction: The management of NCDs is a growing challenge in low- and middle-income settings with the increasing prevalence and the associated demands that such conditions make on health systems. Fragile settings both exacerbate the risk of NCDs and undermine systems capacity. Lebanon is a setting where strategies to address rising NCDs burden have faced particularly acute contextual challenges. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey with patients accessing non-communicable disease across 11 primary care centers within the Greater Beirut and Beqaa areas. Response were received from 1,700 patients. We generated a Clinical Management Index Score as a measure of quality of care, and scores related to a range of socio-demographic characteristics and other context specific variables. Results: Significantly higher clinical management index scores (better quality of care) were associated with patients living in the semi-urban/rural context of Beqaa (compared to Greater Beirut), having health insurance coverage, aged above 60, having high levels of educational attainment, and making partial or full payment for their treatment. Relatively lower index scores (poorer quality of care) were associated with Syrian nationality (compared to Lebanese) and with patients suffering from diabetes or hypertension (compared to comorbid patients). Conclusion: The study identified a wide margin for improving quality of NCDs care in fragile contexts with particular gaps identified in referral to ophthalmology, accessing all prescribed medication and receiving counseling for smoking cessation. Additionally, findings indicate a number of predictors of comparatively poor quality of care that warrant attention, notably with regard to Syrian nationality/legal status, lack of health coverage, seeking free health provision and lower educational attachment. Although these are all relevant risk factors, the findings call on donor agencies, NGOs and provider institutions to design targeted programs and activities that especially ensure equitable delivery of services to diabetic and hypertensive patients with compounded vulnerability as a result of a number of these factors.

The Institute for Global Health and Development

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results