The Institute for Global Health and Development
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Item Measuring the psychosocial, biological, and cognitive signatures of profound stress in humanitarian settings: Impacts, challenges, and strategies in the field(BioMed Central, 2020-06-23) Panter-Brick, Catherine; Eggerman, Mark; Ager, Alastair; Hadfield, Kristin; Dajani, Rana; This research was funded by Elrha’s Research for Health in Humanitarian Crises (R2HC) Programme (https://www.elrha.org/project/yale-psychosocial-call2/) for a total GPB 295,131 in 2015–17 (grant #14045). Elrha aims to improve health outcomes by strengthening the evidence base for public health interventions in humanitarian crises (elrha.org/r2hc). The R2HC programme is funded equally by the Wellcome Trust and the UK Government.Background: Evidence of ‘what works’ in humanitarian programming is important for addressing the disruptive consequences of conflict and forced displacement. However, collecting robust scientific evidence, and ensuring contextual relevance, is challenging. We measured the biological, psychosocial, and cognitive impacts of a structured psychosocial intervention, implemented by Mercy Corps with Syrian refugees and Jordanian host-community youth. In this paper, we present a case analysis of this evaluation study and reflect on the scientific contributions of the work, the challenges experienced in its delivery, and the strategies deployed to address them.Item Understanding fragility: Implications for global health research and practice(Oxford University Press, 2019-12-10) Diaconu, Karin; Falconer, Jennifer; Vidal, Nicole L.; O'May, Fiona; Azasi, Esther; Elimian, Kelly; Bou-Orm, Ibrahim; Sarb, Cristina; Witter, Sophie; Ager, AlastairAdvances in population health outcomes risk being slowed—and potentially reversed—by a range of threats increasingly presented as ‘fragility’. Widely used and critiqued within the development arena, the concept is increasingly used in the field of global health, where its relationship to population health, health service delivery, access and utilization is poorly specified. We present the first scoping review seeking to clarify the meaning, definitions and applications of the term in the global health literature. Adopting the theoretical framework of concept analysis, 10 bibliographic and grey literature sources, and five key journals, were searched to retrieve documents relating to fragility and health. Reviewers screened titles and abstracts and retained documents applying the term fragility in relation to health systems, services, health outcomes and population or community health. Data were extracted according to the protocol; all documents underwent bibliometric analysis. Narrative synthesis was then used to identify defining attributes of the concept in the field of global health. A total of 377 documents met inclusion criteria. There has been an exponential increase in applications of the concept in published literature over the last 10 years. Formal definitions of the term continue to be focused on the characteristics of ‘fragile and conflict-affected states’. However, synthesis indicates diverse use of the concept with respect to: level of application (e.g. from state to local community); emphasis on particular antecedent stressors (including factors beyond conflict and weak governance); and focus on health system or community resources (with an increasing tendency to focus on the interface between two). Amongst several themes identified, trust is noted as a key locus of fragility at this interface, with critical implications for health seeking, service utilization and health system and community resilience.Item Health system resilience in the face of crisis: Analysing the challenges, strategies and capacities for UNRWA in Syria(Oxford University Press, 2019-10-18) Jamal, Zeina; Alameddine, Mohamad; Diaconu, Karin; Lough, Graham; Witter, Sophie; Ager, Alastair; Fouad, Fouad M.Health system resilience reflects the ability to continue service delivery in the face of extraordinary shocks. We examined the case of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) and its delivery of services to Palestine refugees in Syria during the ongoing crisis to identify factors enabling system resilience. The study is a retrospective qualitative case study utilizing diverse methods. We conducted 35 semi-structured interviews with UNRWA clinical and administrative professionals engaged in health service delivery over the period of the Syria conflict. Through a group model building session with a sub-group of eight of these participants, we then elicited a causal loop diagram of health system functioning over the course of the war, identifying pathways of threat and mitigating resilience strategies. We triangulated analysis with data from UNRWA annual reports and routine health management information. The UNRWA health system generally sustained service provision despite individual, community and system challenges that arose during the conflict. We distinguish absorptive, adaptive and transformative capacities of the system facilitating this resilience. Absorptive capacities enabled immediate crisis response, drawing on available human and organizational resources. Adaptive capacities sustained service delivery through revised logistical arrangements, enhanced collaborative mechanisms and organizational flexibility. Transformative capacity was evidenced by the creation of new services in response to changing community needs. Analysis suggests factors such as staff commitment, organizational flexibility and availability of collaboration mechanisms were important assets in maintaining service continuity and quality. This evidence regarding alternative strategies adopted to sustain service delivery in Syria is of clear relevance to other actors seeking organizational resilience in crisis contexts.Item Resilience capacities of health systems: Accommodating the needs of Palestinian refugees from Syria(Elsevier, 2018-10-21) Alameddine, Mohamad; Fouad, Fouad M.; Diaconu, Karin; Jamal, Zeina; Lough, Graham; Witter, Sophie; Ager, AlastairResilience is increasingly recognised as a key process mitigating the impact of shocks and stressors on functioning. The literature on individual and community resilience is being extended to address characteristics of resilient service delivery systems in contexts of adversity. The validity and utility of a capacity-oriented resilience framework (including absorption, adaptation and transformation) is examined with respect to the functioning of United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) health systems in Lebanon and Jordan in the context of the Syrian crisis. We completed 62 semi-structured interviews (30 in Lebanon in November - December, 2016, and 32 in Jordan in January 2017) with professionals at primary care, area, and country management levels. Participants reflected on changes in population health status and health service delivery during the Syrian crisis, notably with respect to the influx of refugees from Syria. Interviews were analysed through inductive thematic analysis and used to critically interrogate health systems resilience against a pro-capacities framework. We find that UNRWA systems in Lebanon and Jordan were broadly resilient, deploying diverse strategies to address health challenges and friction between host and refugee populations. Absorptive capacity was evidenced by successful accommodation of increased patient numbers across most service areas. Adaptive capacities were reflected in broadening of collaboration and reconfiguration of staff roles to enhance service delivery. Transformative capacities were demonstrated in the revision of the service packages provided. While manifest as technical capacities, these clearly drew upon solidarity and commitment linked to the political context of the Palestinian experience. The study adds to the limited literature on health system and organizational resilience and indicates that capacity-oriented framings of resilience are valuable in extracting generalizable lessons for health systems facing adversity. The proposed resilience framework promises to guide strategies for sustained care delivery in these contexts.