The Institute for Global Health and Development
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Integrating healthcare financing for refugees into national health systems: findings from a rapid review of the literature(Elsevier, 2025-10-16) Bertone, Maria Paola; Palmer, Natasha; Witter, SophieAs the number of refugees increases and displacement becomes protracted, providing equitable healthcare in sustainable ways is increasingly challenging. The Global Compact for Refugees calls for greater inclusion of refugees in national health systems. However, evidence is limited on the most suitable approaches to achieve integration, including from a health financing perspective. This study reviewed normative and empirical literatures on health financing for refugees, reflecting on existing arrangements, and their level of integration with national health systems. A total of 52 documents were reviewed following a purposeful search of grey and published literature. Data were analysed according to core health financing sub-functions as defined by the WHO, specifically reflecting on pathways and approaches to integration for each. The analysis found that challenges remains in relation to funding for refugee healthcare, and areas of focus concern fair burden-sharing and engagement of development funders. Fund pooling proves to be a potential entry point for integration to reduce fragmentation in health financing through use of existing mechanisms (budgets or social health insurance schemes), despite challenges highlighted in the empirical literature. Fewer documents look at purchasing and benefit packages, and they highlight the importance of tailoring those to the specific needs of refugees. In relation to equity and efficiency, integration is often assumed to lead to improvements, but evidence is limited and issues related to the underlying weaknesses of the national health system might hamper the benefits of integration. Overall, the review findings support the development of hypotheses as to how best support health financing integration processes, and highlight areas for further research.Item Social determinants and mental health needs of Palestine refugees and UNRWA responses in Gaza during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative assessment(BioMed Central, 2022-12-08) Jamal, Zeina; ElKhatib, Zoheir; AlBaik, Shatha; Horino, Masako; Waleed, Mohammed; Fawaz, Farah; Loffreda, Giulia; Seita, Akihiro; Witter, Sophie; Diaconu, KarinBackground: Due to pre-existing difficulties, refugees are especially susceptible to the negative effects of the pandemic; nonetheless, the pandemic’s effect on this group is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of Palestine refugees in Gaza by identifying the role of social determinants. During the pandemic, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) enacted a number of policies and measures. The purpose of this research was to assess their efficacy and acceptability. Methods: This qualitative study took place between August and November 2020. Twenty-nine key-informant interviews were conducted remotely with UNRWA Headquarters, field and clinical staff in Gaza and with community members, aged ≥18 years and residing in Rafah and Jabalia camps. We sought informed consent verbally or via email. Data was coded based on the framework for social determinants of mental health. Results: Interview results indicated that the relationship might be unidirectional, with COVID-19 causing the degradation of living conditions and vice versa, with living conditions exacerbating the COVID-19 situation by facilitating virus transmission. In other instances, the association between mental health determinants and COVID-19 might be bidirectional. In terms of experiencing violence and anxieties, women, children, and daily-paid employees were significantly more disadvantaged than other groups in the community. UNRWA modified its service delivery techniques in order to continue providing essential services. In general, UNRWA’s strategies throughout the pandemic were deemed beneficial, but insufficient to meet the needs of Gazans. Conclusion: The pandemic highlights the need to go beyond disease treatment and prevention to address social determinants to improve refugees’ health and reduce their susceptibility to future shocks. UNRWA has rapidly implemented telemedicine and mental telehealth services, making it imperative to assess the efficacy of these novel approaches to provide care at a distance. A long-term option may be to employ a hybrid strategy, which combines online and in-person therapy.Item Resilience capacities of health systems: Accommodating the needs of Palestinian refugees from Syria(Elsevier, 2018-10-21) Alameddine, Mohamad; Fouad, Fouad M.; Diaconu, Karin; Jamal, Zeina; Lough, Graham; Witter, Sophie; Ager, AlastairResilience is increasingly recognised as a key process mitigating the impact of shocks and stressors on functioning. The literature on individual and community resilience is being extended to address characteristics of resilient service delivery systems in contexts of adversity. The validity and utility of a capacity-oriented resilience framework (including absorption, adaptation and transformation) is examined with respect to the functioning of United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) health systems in Lebanon and Jordan in the context of the Syrian crisis. We completed 62 semi-structured interviews (30 in Lebanon in November - December, 2016, and 32 in Jordan in January 2017) with professionals at primary care, area, and country management levels. Participants reflected on changes in population health status and health service delivery during the Syrian crisis, notably with respect to the influx of refugees from Syria. Interviews were analysed through inductive thematic analysis and used to critically interrogate health systems resilience against a pro-capacities framework. We find that UNRWA systems in Lebanon and Jordan were broadly resilient, deploying diverse strategies to address health challenges and friction between host and refugee populations. Absorptive capacity was evidenced by successful accommodation of increased patient numbers across most service areas. Adaptive capacities were reflected in broadening of collaboration and reconfiguration of staff roles to enhance service delivery. Transformative capacities were demonstrated in the revision of the service packages provided. While manifest as technical capacities, these clearly drew upon solidarity and commitment linked to the political context of the Palestinian experience. The study adds to the limited literature on health system and organizational resilience and indicates that capacity-oriented framings of resilience are valuable in extracting generalizable lessons for health systems facing adversity. The proposed resilience framework promises to guide strategies for sustained care delivery in these contexts.