The Institute for Global Health and Development
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Item Understanding and addressing mental health needs and non-communicable disease in situations of fragility: RUHF research programme synopsis(NIHR, 2025) Ager, Alastair; Witter, Sophie; Diaconu, Karin; Wurie, Haja; Samai, Mohamed; Saleh, ShadiBackground: Fragile settings – marked by conflict and political, environmental, social, or economic crisis – present severe challenges to population health and the delivery of services. This is particularly the case for health conditions that require continuity of care such as non-communicable disease and mental ill-health. Objectives: To understand existing patterns of health seeking in relation to noncommunicable disease and mental health and the barriers to equitable access to quality provision. To then evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and quality of interventions designed to address these conditions in contexts of fragility. Design and methods: Building on a foundation of focused scoping reviews, we used participatory methods – including group model building – to map pathways of access to community and health system resources in relation to non-communicable diseases and mental health. We then used a range of surveys and key informant interviews to evaluate implemented interventions. In addition, we undertook a series of global reviews of relevant topics, such as conceptualisation of fragility, the role of trust in health-seeking for noncommunicable disease care in fragile settings, analysis of policy and funding priorities of global actors regarding non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries, and the political economy of NCD policy adoption and implementation at national level. Setting and participants: Field studies were focused at the district or governorate level in a range of fragile settings, including Lebanon, Sierra Leone, El Salvador and, latterly, Nigeria and Gaza. Participants included service users, (formal and informal) health providers and policy makers. Interventions: Interventions addressing NCDs included treatment protocols for hypertension and diabetes (with report cards and desk guides supporting primary care-based disease management) and a local co-created salt reduction programme (featuring community drama, school outreach and radio messaging). Mental health needs were primarily addressed in relation to the provision of community-based psychosocial support either through specific interventions (including a lay-woman-led problem solving intervention for perinatal women) or the development of assessment tools (such as a Participatory Assessment Tool for Mapping Social Connections) and contextually valid screening measures (including the Sierra Leone Psychological Distress Scale and the Sierra Leone Perinatal Psychological Distress Scale) to inform interventions. The programme also developed relevant training interventions. Main outcome measures: Measures focused on access to, and utilisation and quality of, services, including user perceptions of provision. Results: We identified a range of barriers to effective health provision in fragile settings. These reflected the cultural, political, social, economic particularities of the setting and its health system. However, trust (in specific health providers, within social and community networks, and in government) was consistently found to be a key factor in securing targeted outcomes. The skills, methods and confidence of providers was also found to be an important influence on such outcomes. Providing contextually relevant training, mentorship and tools equipped health providers in primary care settings to maintain effective, evidencebased management of diabetes and hypertension despite the ongoing challenges of their fragile context. Mobilisation of community-level resources to address non-communicable disease and mental health needs was demonstrated as relevant, feasible and potentially effective in all settings. Limitations: There was great diversity across the particular settings studied, as well as ongoing gaps in knowledge in relation to these conditions in particular. Caution should be shown in generalisation of specific findings to other situations that may not share important features. The COVID 19 pandemic disrupted data collection in both Sierra Leone and Lebanon, although the targeted power of studies was generally secured. More generally, the pandemic significantly impacted health systems operations in all settings studied, an influence that is discussed in all relevant papers. Conclusions: The research programme contributed to addressing gaps in the literature regarding effective tools and strategies to strengthen provision regarding mental health and non-communicable disease in fragile settings. Assessment of needs and barriers to accessing services is an important foundation for effective working in such contexts. This is achievable with research methods (such as group model building and remote data capture) that can accommodate the diverse challenges and uncertainty associated with these settings. Incorporating such information in service design – at the level of the community, health facility or policymaker – can secure improvement in access to, and quality of, important services. Donors and policy makers need to attend not just to the drivers of fragility but also to coherent investment in public health systems and in processes of community engagement if health needs are to be meaningfully addressed. Future work: The conceptualisation of fragility (and resilience) developed through this programme is informing the design of community, health system and wider cross-sectoral interventions in fragile contexts through the ReBuild for Resilience programme in settings including Sierra Leone, Lebanon, Myanmar and Nepal. Further work across diverse contexts of fragility is required to both identify common features and principles required for health response in these settings and refine strategies and tools that can readily be adapted to the unique characteristics of any particular context.Item Identifying vulnerabilities in essential health services: Analysing the effects of system shocks on childhood vaccination delivery in Lebanon(Elsevier, 2024-08-28) Ismail, Sharif A.; Tomoaia-Cotisel, Andrada; Noubani, Aya; Fouad, Fouad M.; Trogrlić, Robert Šakić; Bell, Sadie; Blanchet, Karl; Borghi, JosephineShocks effects are under-theorised in the growing literature on health system resilience. Existing work has focused on the effects of single shocks on discrete elements within the health system, typically at national level. Using qualitative system dynamics, we explored how effects of multiple shocks interacted across system levels and combined with existing vulnerabilities to produce effects on essential health services delivery, through the prism of a case study on childhood vaccination in Lebanon. Lebanon has experienced a series of shocks in recent years, including large-scale refugee arrivals from neighbouring Syria, the COVID-19 pandemic and a political-economic crisis. We developed a causal loop diagram (CLD) to explore the effects of each shock individually, and in combination. The CLD was developed and validated using qualitative data from interviews with 38 stakeholders working in Lebanon's vaccination delivery system, in roles ranging from national level policy to facility-level service delivery, conducted between February 2020 and January 2022. We found that each of the shocks had different effects on service demand- and supply-side dynamics. These effects cascaded from national through to local levels. Both Syrian refugee movement and the COVID-19 pandemic primarily exposed vulnerabilities in service demand, mainly through slowly emerging knock-on effects on vaccination uptake behaviour among host communities, and fear of contracting infection in crowded health facilities respectively. The economic crisis exposed wider system vulnerabilities, including demand for vaccination as household income collapsed, and supply-side effects such as reduced clinic time for vaccination, declining workforce retention, and reduced availability of viable vaccine doses, among others. Finally, important pathways of interaction between shocks were identified, particularly affecting the balance between demand for vaccination through publicly supported facilities and private clinics. Future research should incorporate dynamic approaches to identifying within-system vulnerabilities and their potential impacts under different scenarios, as a precursor to improved resilience measurement, system preparedness, and intervention targeting.Item Health system governance in settings with conflict-affected populations: a systematic review(Oxford University Press, 2022-03-22) Lokot, Michelle; Bou-Orm, Ibrahim; Zreik, Thurayya; Kik, Nour; Fuhr, Daniela C; El Masri, Rozane; Meagher, Kristen; Smith, James; Asmar, Michele Kosremelli; McKee, Martin; Roberts, BayardHealth system governance has been recognized as critical to strengthening healthcare responses in settings with conflict-affected populations. The aim of this review was to examine existing evidence on health system governance in settings with conflict-affected populations globally. The specific objectives were (1) to describe the characteristics of the eligible studies; (2) to describe the principles of health system governance; (3) to examine evidence on barriers and facilitators for stronger health system governance; and (4) to analyse the quality of available evidence. A systematic review methodology was used following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis criteria. We searched six academic databases and used grey literature sources. We included papers reporting empirical findings on health system governance among populations affected by armed conflict, including refugees, asylum seekers, internally displaced populations, conflict-affected non-displaced populations and post-conflict populations. Data were analysed according to the study objectives and informed primarily by a governance framework from the literature. Quality appraisal was conducted using an adapted version of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Of the 6511 papers identified through database searches, 34 studies met eligibility criteria. Few studies provided a theoretical framework or definition for governance. The most frequently identifiable governance principles related to participation and coordination, followed by equity and inclusiveness and intelligence and information. The least frequently identifiable governance principles related to rule of law, ethics and responsiveness. Across studies, the most common facilitators of governance were collaboration between stakeholders, bottom-up and community-based governance structures, inclusive policies and longer-term vision. The most common barriers related to poor coordination, mistrust, lack of a harmonized health response, lack of clarity on stakeholder responsibilities, financial support and donor influence. This review highlights the need for more theoretically informed empirical research on health system governance in settings with conflict-affected populations that draws on existing frameworks for governance.Item The Child PTSD Symptom Scale: Psychometric properties among earthquake survivors(2020-11-27) Hermosilla, Sabrina; Forthal, Sarah; Van Husen, Madeline; Metzler, Janna; Ghimire, Dirgha; Ager, AlastairEvidence for a single underlying factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children remains elusive. We assessed the underlying factor structure of the Child PTSD Symptom Scale through exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in 570 survivors of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake in Nepal. The EFA suggests that the three-factor DSM-IV model fit these data best. The CFA suggests that while the DSM-IV model adequately fit these data, the four-factor King model fit them better. There was no evidence of differential item functioning by age or gender, and internal consistency of the scale was high. PTSD (overall or by factor) was not correlated with functional impairment. Inconsistent psychometric results across contexts and methodologies suggest that our current theoretical conceptualizations and empirical models of posttraumatic stress are lacking. Future studies must both document the instrument properties to assure internal validity and cross-study comparisons and, bolstered by increased psychometric data and analyses, rework theoretical models of PTSD with improved cross-cultural validity.Item Living with transience in high-risk humanitarian spaces: Gendered experiences of international staff and policy implications for building resilience(Wiley, 2020-08-10) Strohmeier, Hannah; Panter-Brick, CatherineBeing deployed in crisis zones is perilous business. To-date, little is known regarding how humanitarian workers relate social and professional goals to lived experiences of high-risk environments. In South Sudan, ranked as the most dangerous country for aid workers globally, we interviewed international humanitarian staff (n=20) to examine, using thematic and interpretative phenomenological analysis, their sense of place, wellbeing, and vocation. Subjectivities of humanitarian spaces hinged upon negotiating physical hardships and social relationships: Juba was described both as a "prison" and "party hot spot." For expatriate staff, making sense of spatial, social, and professional transience was sharply gendered and rooted in subjectivities of risk-taking, crisis-managing, and career-building. We highlight two policy measures to address the implications of transience for human wellbeing and organizational effectiveness. Efforts to support teams and structure work environments, altering the humanitarian and vocational bubble, will help build resilience at the heart of humanitarian systems.Item Evaluating the reliability and validity of secondary reporting to measure gender-based violence in conflict and disaster(BMC, 2020-08-06) Stark, Lindsay; Roberts, Les; Yu, Gary; Tan, Timothy M.; Nagar, Aishwarya; Ager, AlastairBackground Accurately identifying the magnitude of gender-based violence (GBV) in humanitarian settings is hindered by logistical and methodological complexities. The ‘Neighborhood Method’, an adapted household survey that uses primary and secondary reporting to assess the prevalence of GBV in humanitarian settings, reduces the length of time and cost associated with traditional surveys. Primary female adult respondents disclose incidents of physical violence, intimate and non-intimate partner rape for themselves, other females in their homes (standard reporting) and other women and children in their social networks (secondary reporting). This study examines the reliability and validity of this inclusion of secondary reporting to determine the comparability of the Neighborhood Method to a traditional survey approach.