Repository logo
 

The Institute for Global Health and Development

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/9

Browse

Filters

2024 - 20253

Settings

Start date: 2024Subject: search.filters.subject.Community Engagement

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Understanding and addressing mental health needs and non-communicable disease in situations of fragility: RUHF research programme synopsis
    (NIHR, 2025) Ager, Alastair; Witter, Sophie; Diaconu, Karin; Wurie, Haja; Samai, Mohamed; Saleh, Shadi
    Background: Fragile settings – marked by conflict and political, environmental, social, or economic crisis – present severe challenges to population health and the delivery of services. This is particularly the case for health conditions that require continuity of care such as non-communicable disease and mental ill-health. Objectives: To understand existing patterns of health seeking in relation to noncommunicable disease and mental health and the barriers to equitable access to quality provision. To then evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and quality of interventions designed to address these conditions in contexts of fragility. Design and methods: Building on a foundation of focused scoping reviews, we used participatory methods – including group model building – to map pathways of access to community and health system resources in relation to non-communicable diseases and mental health. We then used a range of surveys and key informant interviews to evaluate implemented interventions. In addition, we undertook a series of global reviews of relevant topics, such as conceptualisation of fragility, the role of trust in health-seeking for noncommunicable disease care in fragile settings, analysis of policy and funding priorities of global actors regarding non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries, and the political economy of NCD policy adoption and implementation at national level. Setting and participants: Field studies were focused at the district or governorate level in a range of fragile settings, including Lebanon, Sierra Leone, El Salvador and, latterly, Nigeria and Gaza. Participants included service users, (formal and informal) health providers and policy makers. Interventions: Interventions addressing NCDs included treatment protocols for hypertension and diabetes (with report cards and desk guides supporting primary care-based disease management) and a local co-created salt reduction programme (featuring community drama, school outreach and radio messaging). Mental health needs were primarily addressed in relation to the provision of community-based psychosocial support either through specific interventions (including a lay-woman-led problem solving intervention for perinatal women) or the development of assessment tools (such as a Participatory Assessment Tool for Mapping Social Connections) and contextually valid screening measures (including the Sierra Leone Psychological Distress Scale and the Sierra Leone Perinatal Psychological Distress Scale) to inform interventions. The programme also developed relevant training interventions. Main outcome measures: Measures focused on access to, and utilisation and quality of, services, including user perceptions of provision. Results: We identified a range of barriers to effective health provision in fragile settings. These reflected the cultural, political, social, economic particularities of the setting and its health system. However, trust (in specific health providers, within social and community networks, and in government) was consistently found to be a key factor in securing targeted outcomes. The skills, methods and confidence of providers was also found to be an important influence on such outcomes. Providing contextually relevant training, mentorship and tools equipped health providers in primary care settings to maintain effective, evidencebased management of diabetes and hypertension despite the ongoing challenges of their fragile context. Mobilisation of community-level resources to address non-communicable disease and mental health needs was demonstrated as relevant, feasible and potentially effective in all settings. Limitations: There was great diversity across the particular settings studied, as well as ongoing gaps in knowledge in relation to these conditions in particular. Caution should be shown in generalisation of specific findings to other situations that may not share important features. The COVID 19 pandemic disrupted data collection in both Sierra Leone and Lebanon, although the targeted power of studies was generally secured. More generally, the pandemic significantly impacted health systems operations in all settings studied, an influence that is discussed in all relevant papers. Conclusions: The research programme contributed to addressing gaps in the literature regarding effective tools and strategies to strengthen provision regarding mental health and non-communicable disease in fragile settings. Assessment of needs and barriers to accessing services is an important foundation for effective working in such contexts. This is achievable with research methods (such as group model building and remote data capture) that can accommodate the diverse challenges and uncertainty associated with these settings. Incorporating such information in service design – at the level of the community, health facility or policymaker – can secure improvement in access to, and quality of, important services. Donors and policy makers need to attend not just to the drivers of fragility but also to coherent investment in public health systems and in processes of community engagement if health needs are to be meaningfully addressed. Future work: The conceptualisation of fragility (and resilience) developed through this programme is informing the design of community, health system and wider cross-sectoral interventions in fragile contexts through the ReBuild for Resilience programme in settings including Sierra Leone, Lebanon, Myanmar and Nepal. Further work across diverse contexts of fragility is required to both identify common features and principles required for health response in these settings and refine strategies and tools that can readily be adapted to the unique characteristics of any particular context.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The effectiveness of the Sierra Leone health sector’s response to COVID-19: a quantitative analysis
    (BioMed Central, 2025-03-12) Osborne, Augustus; Amara, Philip S.; M’Cormack-Hale, Fredline A.O.; Kanu, Mohamed; Kanu, Alhassan Fouard; Yillah, Regina Mamidy; Gooding, Kate; Witter, Sophie
    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges to health systems globally, particularly in low-resource settings like Sierra Leone. Understanding the effectiveness of leadership, health workforce performance, community engagement, and service delivery during the pandemic is critical for strengthening future pandemic, preparedness and response. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 303 respondents, including stakeholders from the Ministry of Health, district health management teams, and community health workers. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed to assess perceptions of leadership, workforce performance, community participation, and disruptions to health services. Results: Leadership and governance were rated as “effective” or “very effective” by 58% of respondents, with key challenges including inadequate communication, delays in resource mobilization, and limited transparency. The health workforce demonstrated strong commitment (62%), but gaps in infection prevention and control training (48%) and shortages of personal protective equipment (39%) were significant barriers. Community engagement was moderately effective, with 54% rating it as “effective” or “very effective.” However, low trust in the health sector and misinformation hindered compliance with preventive measures. Maternal and child health services were the most disrupted, but innovative approaches such as telemedicine and mobile health units were adopted to mitigate service interruptions. Conclusion: Sierra Leone’s COVID-19 response highlighted both achievements and challenges. While leadership structures, workforce dedication, and community health worker contributions were notable strengths, gaps in communication, resource availability, and community trust limited the overall effectiveness of the response. Strengthening communication channels, investing in workforce training and resources, and enhancing community engagement strategies are critical for improving preparedness and response in future health emergencies.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Risk communication and community engagement in the context of COVID-19 response in Bangladesh: a qualitative study
    (Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-01-05) Kamruzzaman, Mohammed; Rahman, Aminur; Reidpath, Daniel; Akhter, Sadika
    Background: The global COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted nations worldwide, and Bangladesh was no exception. In response, the government of Bangladesh implemented community awareness initiatives aimed at containing the spread of the virus, aligned with international guidelines and recommendations. Despite these efforts, a lack of comprehensive community awareness programs played an essential role during the pandemic, not the preventive measures. A qualitative study employing framing theory was conducted to gain a deeper insight into how the social context influenced risk communication and community response throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh. Methods: The study was conducted in four selected districts of Bangladesh from February to May 2022 using complementary data collection methods, including key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions with purposely selected participants. Data were analyzed thematically by following six steps of the thematic analysis process. Codes were developed based on the data and summarized into themes and sub-themes grounded on the codes. Results: The findings indicate that the government of Bangladesh, along with development partners and non-government organizations, made a significant effort to raise awareness about COVID-19 in the community. However, there were certain limitations to this effort. These include a lack of social science and public health approaches to understanding the pandemic; inadequate coordination among the authorities for COVID-19 prevention and control; technological and geographical barriers for disseminating messages; the living conditions and lack of facilities; socio-cultural norms in understanding the COVID-19 health messages, and the gendered understanding of the messages. The findings also revealed that the awareness activities remained a one-way approach to inform the people and faced challenges to actively engage and create ownership of the community in the pandemic response. Conclusion: The study identified gaps in implementing risk communication and community engagement strategies in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increasing focus on public health and prioritizing community ownership is essential to designing a more effective community awareness campaign. This approach will help ensure that health messages are communicated effectively and tailored to different communities’ needs.