Repository logo
 

Extending the assessment of patient-centredness in health care: Development of the updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale using exploratory factor analysis

dc.contributor.authorJones, Martyn
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, B.
dc.contributor.authorRattray, Janice
dc.contributor.authorMacGillivray, S.
dc.contributor.authorBaldie, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorAbubakari, R.
dc.contributor.authorCoyle, J.
dc.contributor.authorMackie, Susan
dc.contributor.authorMcKenna, Eileen
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-29T21:37:15Z
dc.date.available2018-06-29T21:37:15Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-03
dc.description.abstractAims and objectives To update and re-validate the Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale for use as a patient appraisal of received healthcare. Background Healthcare in the United Kingdom and beyond is required to deliver high quality, person-centred care that is clinically effective and safe. However, patient experience is not uniform, and complaints often focus on the way patients have been treated. Legislation in United Kingdom requires health services to gather and use patients' evaluations of care to improve services. Design This study uses scoping literature reviews, cognitive testing of questionnaire items with patient and healthcare staff focus groups, and exploratory factor analysis. Methods/Setting/Participants Data were collected from 790 participants across 34 wards in two acute hospitals in one National Health Service Health Board in Scotland from September 2011-February 2012. Ethics and Research and Development approval were obtained. Results Fifty six unique items identified through literature review were added to 72 original Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale items. Face validity interviews removed ambiguous or low relevance items leaving 88 items for administration to patients. Two hundred and ninety questionnaires were returned, representing 37% response rate, 71 were incomplete. Thus 219 complete data were used for Exploratory Factor Analysis with varimax orthogonal rotation. This revealed a 31 item, three factor solution, Care and Respect; Understanding and Engagement; Patient Concerns, with good reliability, concurrent and discriminant validity in terms of gender. A shortened 10 item measure based on the top 3 or 4 loading items on each scale was comparable. Relevance to clinical practice The short scale version is now being routinized in real-time evaluation of patient experience contributing to this United Kingdom, National Health Service setting meeting its policy and legislative requirements. What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community? -The updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale; -Is a reliable and valid measure specifically designed to capture the issues that matter most to people receiving secondary care. -Has been developed based upon current conceptualisations of person-centred care and the clinical practices required to deliver this. -May be used within service improvement work as a trigger to ensure person-centred care delivery.
dc.description.eprintid4768
dc.description.facultysch_nur
dc.description.ispublishedpub
dc.description.number01-Feb
dc.description.referencetextCare Commission (2016). NHS patient surveys: Response rates for the community mental health. London: Care Commission. Clywd, A., & Hart, T. (2013). A review of the NHS complaints system: Putting patients back in the picture. London: Department of Health. Cornwell, J., Levenson, R., Sonola, L., & Poteliakhoff, E. (2012). Continuity of care for older hospital patients: A call for action. London: Kings Fund. Coyle, J., & Williams, B. (1999). Seeing the wood for the trees: Defining the forgotten concept of patient dissatisfaction in the light of patient satisfaction research. Leadership in Health Services, 12(4), i-ix. Coyle, J., & Williams, B. (2001). Valuing People As Individuals: Development of an instrument through a survey of person-centredness in secondary care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36(3), 450-459. De Silva, D. (2014). Helping measure person-centred care: A review of evidence about commonly used approaches and tools to help measure person- centred care. London: Health Foundation. Dozier, A., Kitzman, H., Ingersoll, G., Holmberg, S., & Schultz, A. (2001). Development of an instrument to measure patient perception of the quality of nursing care. Research in Nursing and Health, 24, 506-517. Duffy, J., Hoskins, L., & Seifert, R. (2007). Dimensions of caring: Psychometric evaluation of the caring assessment tool. Advanced Nursing Science, 30(3), 235-245. Dufrene, R. (2000). An evaluation of a patient satisfaction survey: Validity and reliability. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 293-300. Duncan, E. (2011). Person centred care: What is it, can it be improved?. University of Stirling, Retrieved from http://www.knowledge.scot. nhs.uk/media/CLT/ResourceUploads/4003769/Person%20centred% 20care%20Lit%20review.pdf Entwistle, V., Firnigl, D., Ryan, M., Francis, J., & Kinghorn, P. (2012). Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 17(2), 70-78. https://doi. org/10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011029 Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage. Frances, R. (2013). The Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Enquiry. London. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ 20150407084003/http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report Graham, C. (2007). A review for the NHS acute patient survey programme. Oxford: Picker Institute. Hendricks, A., Vrielink, M., Smets, E., Van Es, S., & De Haes, J. (2001). Improving the assessment of (in)patients' satisfaction with hospital care. Medical Care, 39(3), 270-283. IBM Corp. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Released 2010 (version 19.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: The IOM Health Care Quality Initiative.Washington, DC, USA: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press. Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., & Bruster, S. (2002). The picker patient experience questionnaire: Development and validation using data from inpatient surveys in five countries. International Journal of Quality and Health Care, 14, 353-358. Jones, M., & Rattray, R. (2015). Questionnaire design. In K. Gerrish, & J. Lathlean (Eds.), The research process in nursing (7th ed., pp. 415-425). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Keogh, B. (2013). Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 hospital trusts in England: Overview report. London. Retrieved from http://www.nhs.uk/nhsengland/bruce-keogh-review/documents/ outcomes/keogh-review-final-report.pdf Khan, K., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: How to review and apply review findings of healthcare research. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press. Kleefstra, S., Kool, R., Veldkamp, C., Winters-van der Meer, A., Mens, M., Blijham, G., & de Haes, J. (2010). A core questionnaire for the assessment of patient satisfaction in academic hospitals in the Netherlands: Development and first results in a nationwide study. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 19(5), e24. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2008.030825 Knafl, K., Deatrick, J., Gallo, A., Holcombe, G., Bakitas, M., Dixon, J., & Grey, M. (2007). Focus on research methods: The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Research in Nursing and Health, 30, 224-234. McCance, T., Hastings, J., & Dowler, H. (2015). Evaluating the use of key performance indicators to evidence the patient experience. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24, 3084-3094. McCance, T., McCormack, B., & Dewing, J. (2011). An exploration of person- centredness in practice. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man01 McCormack, B., Dewing, J., Breslin, L., Tobin, C., Manning, M., Coyne-Nevin, A., . . . Peelo-Kilroe, L. (2010). The implementation of a model of personcentred practice in older person settings. Final Report, Dublin, Ireland: Office of the Nursing Services Director, Health Services Executive. McCormack, B., & McCance, T. (Eds.) (2017). Person-centred practice in nursing and health care: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley Blackhall. National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England. (2013). Improving the safety of patients in England: A promise to learn, a commitment to act. London: Department of Health. Nightingale, F. (1860). Notes on nursing: What it is and what it is not (1st ed.). New York: D Appleton and Company. Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin C. Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics, Vol. 6. Boston: Pearson. The Department of Health. (2008). High quality care for all: NHS next stage final report. London: The Stationary Office. The Health Foundation. (2014). Person-centred care made simple. London. Retrieved from http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_25220-6.pdf The Scottish Government. (2010). NHSScotland Quality Strategy-Putting people at the heart of our NHS. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. The Scottish Government. (2011). The Patient Rights (Scotland) Act 2011. Edinburgh. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Health/Polic y/Patients-Rights Wain, R., Kneebone, I., & Billings, J. (2008). Patient experience of neurologic rehabilitation: A qualitative investigation. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 89, 1366-1371. Ware, J., Snyder, M., & Wright, W. (1976a). Development and Validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with medical care services: Review of literature, overview of methods and results regarding construction of scales. Springfield, VA. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/ health/surveys_tools/psq.html Ware, J., Snyder, M., & Wright, W. (1976b). Development and validation of scales to measure patient satisfaction with medical care services: Results regarding scales constructed from the patient satisfaction questionnaire and measures of other health care perceptions. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service. NTIS Publication No 288-329. Williams, B. (1994). Patient satisfaction: A valid concept? Social Science & Medicine, 38(4), 509-516. Williams, B., Coyle, J., & Healy, D. (1998). The meaning of patient satisfaction: An explanation of high reported levels. Social Science & Medicine, 47(9), 1351-1360. Williams, B., & Grant, G. (1998). Defining people-centredness-: Making the implicit explicit. Health and Social Care in the Community, 6(2), 84-94. World Health Organisation. (2006). Quality of Care: A Process for Making Strategic Choices in Health Systems, 2006. Geneva: WHO. Zill, J., Scholl, I., H_rter, M., & Dirmaier, J. (2015). Which dimensions of patient-centredness matter? Results of a web-based expert delphi study [Electronic Version]. Plos one. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0141978. Retrieved Accessed 10th February 2017.
dc.description.statuspub
dc.description.volume27
dc.format.extent65-76
dc.identifierER4768
dc.identifier.citationJones, M.C., Williams, B., Rattray, J., MacGillivray, S., Baldie, D., Abubakari, A.-R., Coyle, J., Mackie, S. and McKenna, E. (2018) ‘Extending the assessment of patient-centredness in health care: Development of the updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale using exploratory factor analysis’, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(1–2), pp. 65–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13845.
dc.identifier.doihttp://doi:10.1111/jocn.13845
dc.identifier.issn9621067
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13845
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13845
dc.identifier.urihttps://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/4768
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Nursing
dc.titleExtending the assessment of patient-centredness in health care: Development of the updated Valuing Patients as Individuals Scale using exploratory factor analysis
dc.typearticle
dcterms.accessRightspublic
qmu.authorBaldie, Deborah
refterms.dateAccepted2017-03-18
refterms.dateFCD2017-08-11
rioxxterms.typearticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
4768aam.docx
Size:
114.34 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Accepted version
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
4768 supplementary information.docx
Size:
23.09 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Supplementary information

Collections